%0 Journal Article
%T Monitoring and evaluation of energy saving and pollution reduction performance (ESPRP) and its coordination with economic benefit<br>节能减排绩效及其与经济效益协调性的监控和评估
%A HE Wei
%A QIN Ning
%A HE Qishuang
%A WANG Yan
%A XU Fuliu
%A <br>何伟
%A 秦宁
%A 何玘霜
%A 王雁
%A 徐福留
%J 环境科学学报
%D 2010
%I 
%X Arectangular coordinate diagram based on the relationships between energy saving performance (ESP) and pollution reduction performance (PRP),and a triangle diagram based on the interrelationships among ESP,PRPand economic benefit,were designed to illustrate the statuses and trends of energy saving and pollution reduction performance (ESPRP) and its coordination with economic benefit,respectively. As a case study,China's petroleum,chemical and metallurgical industries,including petroleum and natural gas extraction (O1),nonmetal mineral mining and dressing (O2),petroleum refining and coking (O3),raw chemical materials and chemical products (O4),chemical fiber (O5),rubber products (O6),plastic products (O7),smelting and pressing of ferrous metals (O8),smelting and pressing of nonferrous metals (O9),and metal products (O10),were selected to evaluate the status and long-term trends of the ESPRPand its coordination with economic benefit from 1997 to 2006. The results show that 9 of 10 industry sectors belong to the very bad or bad ESPRPstatus. The plastic products industry has the best ESPRPperformance status. Four out of ten industry sectors' ESPRP,including O3,O4,O8 and O10,have a trend to become worse in the future. In2006,discrete level of coordination between ESPRPand economic benefit is higher than that in1997. In2006,10 industry sectors distribute in 5 different statuses,O1 and O2 at very strongly uncoordinated status,O3 at strongly uncoordinated status,O4,O8,and O9 at weakly coordinated status,O5 and O7 at strongly coordinated status,and O6 and O10 at very strongly coordinated status; O1,O2,and O3 have weak coordination trends; O4,O5,O6,O8,O9 and O10 have strong coordination trends; O7 has a strong coordination trend first,then a weak coordination trend. The ESP-PRPrelationship diagram and triangle method,as an intuitive platform for illustrating the status and trends of ESERPand its coordination with economic benefit,seems to hold promise as an analytical management tool given its simplicity,ease of use,and flexibility.
%K energy saving performance (ESP)
%K pollution reduction performance (PRP)
%K economic benefit
%K coordination
%K monitoring
%K evaluation
%K triangle method<br>节能绩效
%K 减排绩效
%K 经济效益
%K 协调性
%K 监控
%K 评估
%K 三角图
%U http://www.alljournals.cn/get_abstract_url.aspx?pcid=3FF3ABA7486768130C3FF830376F43B398E0C97F0FF2DD53&cid=A7CA601309F5FED03C078BCE383971DC&jid=03A55E61A8750ACAC6AF81EF9E2AC838&aid=5238947FDE8EEBA4040FEA5477FB312C&yid=140ECF96957D60B2&vid=340AC2BF8E7AB4FD&iid=DF92D298D3FF1E6E&sid=D56713C22DA9FDE8&eid=AEA8CA70A6C58E24&journal_id=0253-2468&journal_name=环境科学学报&referenced_num=0&reference_num=17