%0 Journal Article
%T Comparison of Important Ontology Specification Languages<br>主要本体表示语言的比较研究
%A Li Jing
%A <br>李景
%J 现代图书情报技术
%D 2005
%I 
%X There were basic features of ontology specification languages introduced in this article briefly. 13 important kinds of them were analysed and compared according to the framework formulated by Asuncion Gomez - Perez and Oscar Corcho, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid. The conclusion was: Loom, CycL and OWL were the better choices for users to mark up ontologies.
%K 本体
%K 本体表示语言
%K 比较研究
%K 描述功能
%K 推理
%U http://www.alljournals.cn/get_abstract_url.aspx?pcid=B5EDD921F3D863E289B22F36E70174A7007B5F5E43D63598017D41BB67247657&cid=E46382710BF131B2&jid=24AADBCD0D5373C73F37F78D10E2F717&aid=8E68D4A0708503AA&yid=2DD7160C83D0ACED&vid=659D3B06EBF534A7&iid=CA4FD0336C81A37A&sid=CA4FD0336C81A37A&eid=E158A972A605785F&journal_id=1003-3513&journal_name=现代图书情报技术&referenced_num=12&reference_num=14