%0 Journal Article
%T Long-term outcomes of anthroposophic therapy for chronic low back pain: A two-year follow-up analysis
%A Harald J Hamre
%A Claudia M Witt
%A Gunver S Kienle
%A Anja Glockmann
%A et al.
%J Journal of Pain Research
%D 2009
%I Dove Medical Press
%R http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S5922
%X ng-term outcomes of anthroposophic therapy for chronic low back pain: A two-year follow-up analysis Original Research (5274) Total Article Views Authors: Harald J Hamre, Claudia M Witt, Gunver S Kienle, Anja Glockmann, et al. Published Date June 2009 Volume 2009:2 Pages 75 - 85 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S5922 Harald J Hamre1, Claudia M Witt2, Gunver S Kienle1, Anja Glockmann1, Renatus Ziegler3, Stefan N Willich2,  Helmut Kiene1 1Institute for Applied Epistemology and Medical Methodology, Freiburg, Germany; 2Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health Economics,  Charit谷 University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany; 3Society for Cancer Research, Arlesheim, Switzerland Background: Anthroposophic treatment for chronic low back pain (LBP) includes special artistic and physical therapies and special medications. In a previously published prospective cohort study, anthroposophic treatment for chronic LBP was associated with improvements of pain, back function, and quality of life at 12-month follow-up. These improvements were at least comparable to improvements in a control group receiving conventional care. We conducted a two-year follow-up analysis of the anthroposophic therapy group with a larger sample size. Methods: Seventy-five consecutive adult outpatients in Germany, starting anthroposophic treatment for discogenic or non-specific LBP of ≡6 weeks＊ duration participated in a prospective cohort study. Main outcomes were Hanover Functional Ability Questionnaire (HFAQ; 0每100), LBP Rating Scale Pain Score (LBPRS; 0每100), Symptom Score (0每10), and SF-36 after 24 months. Results: Eighty-five percent of patients were women. Mean age was 49.0 years. From baseline to 24-month follow-up all outcomes improved significantly; average improvements were: HFAQ 11.1 points (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.5每16.6; p < 0.001), LBPRS 8.7 (95% CI: 4.4每13.0; p < 0.001), Symptom Score 2.0 (95% CI: 1.3每2.8; p < 0.001), SF-36 Physical Component Summary 6.0 (95% CI: 2.9每9.1; p < 0.001), and SF-36 Mental Component Summary 4.0 (95% CI: 1.1每6.8; p = 0.007). Conclusion: Patients with chronic LBP receiving anthroposophic treatment had sustained improvements of symptoms, back function, and quality of life, suggesting that larger multicenter rigorous studies may be worthwhile.
%K anthroposophy
%K drug therapy
%K eurythmy therapy
%K low back pain
%K follow-up studies
%U https://www.dovepress.com/long-term-outcomes-of-anthroposophic-therapy-for-chronic-low-back-pain-peer-reviewed-article-JPR