%0 Journal Article
%T LA INTERRUPCI¨®N NATURAL DE LA PRESCRIPCI¨®N EN MATERIA DE RESPONSABILIDAD POR VICIOS DE LA CONSTRUCCI¨®N: COMENTARIO A LA SENTENCIA PRONUNCIADA POR LA EXCELENT¨ªSIMA CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA, CON FECHA DE 29 DE OCTUBRE DE 2008 EN EL RECURSO DE CASACI¨®N EN EL FONDO
%A Femen¨ªas Salas
%A Jorge Andr¨¦s
%J Revista chilena de derecho
%D 2010
%I Scientific Electronic Library Online
%R 10.4067/S0718-34372010000300007
%X the judgment which is hereby commented, which was recently issued by the chilean supreme court of justice, contains a dangerous argument. the generalization of this case law in our legal system would run against principles that constitute the fundamental basis of the concept of statute of limitations. indeed, the argument sustained in the judgment commented could eventually lead to the illogic situation that actions arising from warranty obligations or obligations to repair damages would never expire, thereby affecting certainty, legal security and the basic principles of our legal system.
%K statute of limitations
%K natural interruption
%K warranty obligation
%K post-selling services
%K abuse of law
%K good faith.
%U http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0718-34372010000300007&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en