Green hydrogen is increasingly promoted as a key vector for deep decarbonisation and energy system transformation, particularly in regions endowed with abundant renewable resources. However, its economic viability remains highly context dependent and sensitive to system design and financing conditions. Many green hydrogen projects continue to struggle to reach final investment decision due to high production costs and low electrolyser utilisation, despite rapid growth in announced capacity. This study examines the techno-economic optimisation of solar-based green hydrogen production in Burkina Faso, a solar-rich but infrastructure-constrained West African country. An integrated optimisation framework is developed to minimise the levelized cost of hydrogen by jointly determining photovoltaic capacity, electrolyser size, and hydrogen storage requirements under realistic solar availability and financial assumptions. The analysis explicitly accounts for temporal variability in solar generation and capital-intensive system components. The results show that moderate photovoltaic oversizing relative to electrolyser capacity is economically optimal, as it improves utilisation and reduces hydrogen cost even when some energy curtailment occurs. Electrolyser capital expenditure emerges as the dominant technical cost driver, while financing conditions exert the strongest overall influence on hydrogen cost outcomes. These findings are consistent with recent evidence highlighting the central role of utilisation and cost of capital in green hydrogen economics. Locally grounded, optimisation-based analyses are essential for producing policy-relevant insights in developing economies. By providing a country-specific assessment for Burkina Faso, this study contributes empirical evidence on how solar resource abundance can be translated into cost-effective green hydrogen systems through integrated design and supportive financial frameworks. The results offer practical guidance for policymakers and investors seeking to advance green hydrogen deployment in solar-rich developing regions.
Cite this paper
Coulibaly, P. H. L. J. and Javed, M. S. (2026). Techno-Economic Optimization of Solar-Based Green Hydrogen Production in Burkina Faso. Open Access Library Journal, 13, e15052. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1115052.
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2024) Global Hydrogen Review 2024. International Energy Agency. <br>https://www.iea.org/reports/global-hydrogen-review-2024
International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) (2023) Renewables Readiness Assessment: Burkina Faso. International Renewable Energy Agency. <br>https://www.irena.org/Publications/2023/Dec/Renewables-readiness-assessment-Burkina-Faso
International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) (2021) Utility-Scale Solar and Wind Areas: Burkina Faso. International Renewable Energy Agency. <br>https://www.irena.org/Publications/2021/Sep/Utility-scale-solar-and-wind-areas-Burkina-Faso
Terlouw, T., Bauer, C., McKenna, R. and Mazzotti, M. (2022) Large-Scale Hydrogen Production <i>via</i> Water Electrolysis: A Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessment. <i>Energy</i> <i>&</i> <i>Environmental</i> <i>Science</i>, 15, 3583-3602. <br>https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ee01023b
Rezaei, M., Akimov, A. and Gray, E.M. (2024) Cost-Competitiveness of Green Hydrogen and Its Sensitivity to Major Financial and Technical Variables. <i>International</i> <i>Journal</i> <i>of</i> <i>Hydrogen</i> <i>Energy</i>, 90, 1365-1377. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.068
Zappa, W., Junginger, M. and van den Broek, M. (2019) Is a 100% Renewable European Power System Feasible by 2050? <i>Applied</i> <i>Energy</i>, 233, 1027-1050. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.109
Schmidt, O., Gambhir, A., Staffell, I., Hawkes, A., Nelson, J. and Few, S. (2017) Future Cost and Performance of Water Electrolysis: An Expert Elicitation Study. <i>International</i> <i>Journal</i> <i>of</i> <i>Hydrogen</i> <i>Energy</i>, 42, 30470-30492. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.045
Frieden, F. and Leker, J. (2024) Future Costs of Hydrogen: A Quantitative Review. <i>Sustainable</i> <i>Energy</i> <i>&</i> <i>Fuels</i>, 8, 1806-1822. <br>https://doi.org/10.1039/d4se00137k
Glenk, G. and Reichelstein, S. (2019) Economics of Converting Renewable Power to Hydrogen. <i>Nature</i> <i>Energy</i>, 4, 216-222. <br>https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0326-1
International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) (2020) Green Hydrogen Cost Reduction: Scaling Up Electrolysers to Meet the 1.5°C Climate Goal. International Renewable Energy Agency.<br>https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Dec/Green-hydrogen-cost-reduction
Oyewo, A.S., Sterl, S., Khalili, S. and Breyer, C. (2023) Highly Renewable Energy Systems in Africa: Rationale, Research, and Recommendations. <i>Joule</i>, 7, 1437-1470. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2023.06.004
International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) (2024) Sub-Saharan Africa: Policies and Finance for Renewable Energy. International Renewable Energy Agency. <br>https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2024/Jul/IRENA_SS_Africa_policies_finance_RE_2024.pdf
Bertuccioli, L., Chan, A., Hart, D., Lehner, F., Madden, B. and Standen, E. (2021) Development of Water Electrolysis in the European Union. Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking.
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2021) Global Hydrogen Review 2021. International Energy Agency. <br>https://www.iea.org/reports/global-hydrogen-review-2021
Buttler, A. and Spliethoff, H. (2018) Current Status of Water Electrolysis for Energy Storage, Grid Balancing and Sector Coupling via Power-to-Gas and Power-to-Liquids: A Review. <i>Renewable</i> <i>and</i> <i>Sustainable</i> <i>Energy</i> <i>Reviews</i>, 82, 2440-2454. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.003
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2023) Global Hydrogen Review 2023. International Energy Agency. <br>https://www.iea.org/reports/global-hydrogen-review-2023
International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) (2025) Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2024. International Renewable Energy Agency.<br>https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2025/Jul/IRENA_TEC_RPGC_in_2024_2025.pdf
Staffell, I., Scamman, D., Velazquez Abad, A., Balcombe, P., Dodds, P.E., Ekins, P., <i>et al</i>. (2019) The Role of Hydrogen and Fuel Cells in the Global Energy System. <i>Energy</i> <i>&</i> <i>Environmental</i> <i>Science</i>, 12, 463-491. <br>https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ee01157e
U.S. Department of Energy (2024) Hydrogen Shot: Water Electrolysis Technology Assessment. U.S. Department of Energy. <br>https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-12/hydrogen-shot-water-electrolysis-technology-assessment.pdf
Armijo, J. and Philibert, C. (2020) Flexible Production of Green Hydrogen and Ammonia from Variable Solar and Wind Energy: Case Study of Chile and Argentina. <i>International</i> <i>Journal</i> <i>of</i> <i>Hydrogen</i> <i>Energy</i>, 45, 1541-1558. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.028
Dincer, I. and Acar, C. (2015) Review and Evaluation of Hydrogen Production Methods for Better Sustainability. <i>International</i> <i>Journal</i> <i>of</i> <i>Hydrogen</i> <i>Energy</i>, 40, 11094-11111. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.035
Carmo, M., Fritz, D.L., Mergel, J. and Stolten, D. (2013) A Comprehensive Review on PEM Water Electrolysis. <i>International</i> <i>Journal</i> <i>of</i> <i>Hydrogen</i> <i>Energy</i>, 38, 4901-4934. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151
Bhandari, R., Trudewind, C.A. and Zapp, P. (2014) Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen Production via Electrolysis—A Review. <i>Journal</i> <i>of</i> <i>Cleaner</i> <i>Production</i>, 85, 151-163. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.048
Le, T.S., Nguyen, T.N., Bui, D.-K. and Ngo, T.D. (2023) Optimal Sizing of Renewable Energy Storage: A Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen, Battery and Hybrid Systems Considering Degradation and Seasonal Storage. <i>Applied Energy</i>, 336, 120817. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120817
Vidas, L., Castro, R., Bosisio, A. and Pires, A. (2024) Optimal Sizing of Renewables-to-Hydrogen Systems in a Suitable-Site-Selection Geospatial Framework: The Case Study of Italy and Portugal. <i>Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews</i>, 202, 114620. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114620