%0 Journal Article
%T Effect of Signal Filtering on Image Quality of Projection-Based Magnetic Particle Imaging
%A Kazuki Shimada
%A Kenya Murase
%J Open Journal of Medical Imaging
%P 43-55
%@ 2164-2796
%D 2017
%I Scientific Research Publishing
%R 10.4236/ojmi.2017.72005
%X <strong>Purpose: </strong>Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) allows for imaging of the spatial distribution of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) in positive contrast, with high sensitivity, high spatial resolution, and high imaging speed. It is necessary to increase the signal-to-noise ratio to enhance the reliability of MPI. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of signal filtering on the image quality and quantitativity in projection-based MPI using phantoms. <strong>Materials and Methods:</strong> We fabricated two kinds of phantom (cylindrical tube phantom with a diameter of 6 mm and A-shaped phantom) and evaluated the effect of signal filtering in terms of root-mean-square (RMS) granularity and the correlation coefficient between iron concentrations of MNPs and average MPI values for four filter modes (THRU, BPF, BEF, and LPF). In the THRU mode, the signal input was output without passing through the filter. In the BPF mode, only the third-harmonic signal was passed using a band-pass filter (central frequency: 1200 Hz, band width: 1/3 octave). In the BEF mode, the first-harmonic signal was eliminated using a band-elimination filter (central frequency: 400 Hz, band width: 1/3 octave). In the LPF mode, only the signal with a frequency less than the third-harmonic frequency was passed using a low-pass filter (cut-off frequency: 1200 Hz, -24 ¡À 2 dB/octave). The RMS granularity was obtained by calculating standard deviations of the pixel values in the MPI image without MNPs, whereas average MPI values were obtained by drawing a circular region of interest with a diameter of 6 mm on the MPI image of the cylindrical tube phantom. <strong>Results:</strong> When using the filtered back-projection (FBP) method with a ramp filter for image reconstruction, the RMS granularity and correlation coefficient decreased in the order of THRU, BPF, BEF, and LPF. In the BPF mode, however, some artifacts were observed. When using the maximum likelihood-expectation maximization (ML-EM) algorithm with an iteration number of 15, the correlation coefficient decreased in the order of THRU, BPF, BEF, and LPF, whereas the RMS granularity did not largely depend on the filter mode and was significantly (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) lower than that for the FBP method for all the filter modes. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> The BEF mode is adequate for the FBP method in projection-based MPI, whereas THRU is a best option in use of the ML-EM algorithm.
%K Magnetic Particle Imaging (MPI)
%K Magnetic Nanoparticles (MNPs)
%K Signal Filtering
%K Image Quality
%K Root-Mean-Square (RMS) Granularity
%U http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=76733