%0 Journal Article
%T Gödel and the Incompleteness of Arithmetic
%A &nbsp
%A Pinheiro
%J Advances in Pure Mathematics
%P 537-545
%@ 2160-0384
%D 2016
%I Scientific Research Publishing
%R 10.4236/apm.2016.68042
%X People normally believe
that Arithmetic is not complete because G<span style=\"white-space:nowrap;\">&amp;#214;</span>del launched this idea a long time ago,
and it looks as if nobody has presented sound evidence on the contrary. We here
intend to do that perhaps for the first time in history. We prove that what Stanford
Encyclopedia has referred to as Theorem 3 cannot be true, and, therefore, if nothing
else is presented in favour of G<span style=\"white-space:nowrap;\">&amp;#214;</span>del¡¯s thesis, we actually do not have evidence
on the incompleteness of Arithmetic: All available evidence seems to point at the
extremely opposite direction.
%K G&#246
%K del
%K Arithmetic
%K Peano
%K Axiom
%K Classical Logic
%U http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=68410