%0 Journal Article
%T Reply to ¡°Comments on ¡®There Is No Axiomatic System for the Quantum Theory¡¯¡±
%A Koji Nagata
%J Journal of Quantum Information Science
%P 195-200
%@ 2162-576X
%D 2014
%I Scientific Research Publishing
%R 10.4236/jqis.2014.44018
%X Barros discusses that [Jose Acacio de Barros, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 50,
1828 (2011)] Nagata derives inconsistencies from quantum mechanics [K. Nagata,
Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48, 3532 (2009)]. Barros considers that the
inconsistencies do not come from quantum mechanics, but from extra assumptions
about the reality of observables. Here we discuss the fact that there is a
contradiction within the quantum theory. We discuss the fact that only one
expected value in a spin-1/2 pure state <span style=\"font-family:ËÎÌå;\">¡´¦Ò</span><sub><span>x</span></sub><span style=\"font-family:ËÎÌå;\">¡µ</span><span>rules out the reality of the
observable. We do not accept extra assumptions about the reality of
observables. We use the actually measured results of quantum measurements (raw
data). We use a single Pauli observable. We stress that we can use the quantum
theory even if we give up the axiomatic system for the quantum theory.</span>
%K Quantum Measurement Theory
%K Quantum Computer
%K Formalism
%U http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=52398