%0 Journal Article
%T Healthcare access and the patterns of maternal health care utilization among poor and non-poor women living in urban areas in Portugal
%A Isabel Craveiro
%A Paulo Ferrinho
%A Bruno de Sousa
%A Luzia Gon£¿alves
%J Health
%P 1954-1964
%@ 1949-5005
%D 2013
%I Scientific Research Publishing
%R 10.4236/health.2013.512265
%X <p style=\"text-align:justify;\">
	<b><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;font-size:10pt;\"></span></b>
</p>
<p style=\"text-align:justify;\">
	<b><b><SPAN style=\"FONT-FAMILY: ; FONT-SIZE: 10pt\" ?=\"\"></span></b></b>
</p>
<p style=\"text-align:justify;\">
	<br />
</p>
<p style=\"text-align:justify;\">
	<span style=\"font-family:Verdana;font-size:10pt;\">Introduction: Studies on attitudes and practices are increasingly used but not specifically related to the motivations for the use of reproductive health care among women of fertile age, living in urban areas and in different social contexts. Objectives: The aim of this study was to </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;font-size:10pt;\">estimate the associations between the variables of social status (degree of poverty in the studied groups) and the variables of fecundity (representations, tensions, practices and control of fertility) and, in addition, to compare access to health care in the different studied groups, assessing the association between use of maternal health care and poverty in urban areas. </span><SPAN style=\"FONT-FAMILY: ; FONT-SIZE: 10pt\" ?=\"\"><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">Design: A case-control study was conducted in the Municipality of Lisbon, Portugal, with a total sample of 1513 women of fertile age: 499 cases of women considered very poor were selected from the database of beneficiaries of RSI (Social Welfare Payment for Inclusion); 1014 controls (two controls for each selected case), divided as 507 poor women selected from the other beneficiaries of Santa Casa da Miseric¨®rdia in Lisbon and 507 non-poor women selected from four Health Centers from the Municipality of Lisbon, Portugal. A total of 1054 women answered the questionnaire: 304 cases (response rate of 61%) and 750 (response rate of 74%) controls. The statistical analysis involved descriptive analysis </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">and multinomial logistic regression. Results: The </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">analysis confirms the association between poverty and patterns and representations of fecun</span></span> 
</p>
<p>
	<span style=\"font-family:Verdana;font-size:10pt;\">dity regarding pregnancy planning.</span><SPAN style=\"FONT-FAMILY: ; FONT-SIZE: 10pt\" ?=\"\"> </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;font-size:10pt;\">The results of this study thus show the existence of different distributions on several variables and the gradients of poverty. </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;font-size:10pt;\">Regarding access to health care, the major impact of poverty on women
%K Women
%K Poverty
%K Access to  Reproductive Health Care
%U http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=40475