%0 Journal Article
%T KAR ZMA / CHARISMA
%A Yener ŁżZEN
%J Journal of the Human and Social Science Researches (itobiad)
%D 2012
%I Journal of the Human and Social Science Researches Foundation
%X Bu  al  mada karizman n ne oldu u, ge mi ten gščnščmščze nas l alg land   , toplumun y netimi a  s ndan  nemi vurgulanm  t r. Karizman n yaln zca i sel bir irade olarak kabul edildi i, var olan otorite bi imlerini y kt   ,her y nščyle bščrokratik egemenli in kar  s nda oldu u, yeni sorumluluklar fikirler ve toplumsal ili kiler olu turdu u, di er bir ok liderlik bi iminde oldu u gibi karizmatik liderli in de gščven ve ilham vermek gibi psikolojik bir y nščnščn bulundu u, rasyonel ekonomik davran  lar n tščmščnšč reddetti i, olumlu ve olumsuz olmak ščzere iki y nščnščn bulundu u, karizmatik e ilimli toplumlar n tamam nda farkl  derecelerde ortaya   kt   , rutinin ve kurumsal kal c l   n kar  s nda yer ald   , kaos ve karga an n ya and    ortamlarda ortaya   kt   , yenilik i ve de i ken oldu u g rščlmšč  ve makalede bu de i kenler a  klanm  t r.In this study we tried to explain what the carisma is , how is comprehended from the past onward, and its importance in term of social management. It has been seen that carisma is regarded as an inner trait, it collapses present authotity forms, it places against burocratic dominance in every aspects, it creates new esponsibilities, ideas and social relations, it refuses all rational economical behaviours, it has both positive and negative sides, it emerges at different levels in carismatic-tendency societies, it stands against routin and organizational permanence, it appears in conditions of chaos, it is variable and renovative, as in other leadership forms, carismatic leadership has psychological sides as giving trust and inspiration, and all these variations are explained in this article.
%K Karizma
%K Karizma-de er ili kisi Carisma
%K Carisma-value relation
%U http://www.itobiad.com/upload/File/makale/1350912736.pdf