%0 Journal Article
%T Por qu¨¦ los revisores rechazan mi art¨ªculo si era tan maravilloso? (Why my paper is rejected by reviewers if it is so cool?)
%A Juan A. Marin-Garcia
%J WPOM : Working Papers on Operations Management
%D 2011
%I Universidad Polit¨¦cnica de Valencia
%R 10.4995/wpom.v2i1.809
%X Existe una abundante bibliograf¨ªa acerca de en qu¨¦ consiste la comunicaci¨®n acad¨¦mica, c¨®mo se debe investigar y el protocolo para comunicar lo investigado. Sin embargo, no es inusual encontrarte como editor o como revisor, trabajos que, independientemente de su val¨ªa como investigaci¨®n, est¨¢n pobremente presentados. En este art¨ªculo me gustar¨ªa resumir algunos de los errores comunes que cometen los investigadores que no est¨¢n habituados a escribir art¨ªculos cient¨ªficos y mostrar algunas pautas de soluci¨®n a esos errores. (As editor or reviewer is common to find work, regardless of their value as research, are poorly presented. This is true even though there is abundant literature on what constitutes scholarly communication, how to investigate and the protocol to communicate research. In this article, I summarize some of the common mistakes that researchers who are not used to write papers do. And I show some guidelines to fix these errors.)
%K publicaci¨®n acad¨¦mica
%K investigaci¨®n
%K escritura de art¨ªculos cient¨ªficos
%K academic publication
%K research
%K writing scientific papers
%U http://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/WPOM/article/view/809