全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Inherent Differences between Bound and Radiation Fields

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1104517, PP. 1-18

Subject Areas: Theoretical Physics

Keywords: Maxwellian Electrodynamics, Bound Fields, Radiation Fields, Electromagnetic Lagrangian Density, Quantum Electrodynamics

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to use fundamental theoretical and experimental elements of electrodynamics for deriving properties of radiation fields and of bound fields. A wide variety of examples prove that radiation fields and bound fields do not represent the same physical object. This conclusion is new. Some examples belong to the classical domain and others belong to the quantum domain. Consequences of this outcome affect several physical issues. In particular, these fields should be treated separately. For this reason, changes must be introduced to the present form of the fields’ Lagrangian density of quantum electrodynamics, where the fields tensor Fuv is a sum of bound and radiation fields. Since the Lagrangian density is a key element of the theory, its revision may entail changes of other specific issues. The recent failure of quantum electrodynamics to explain the electron and the muon data of the proton charge radius supports this conclusion.

Cite this paper

Comay, E. (2018). Inherent Differences between Bound and Radiation Fields. Open Access Library Journal, 5, e4517. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104517.

References

[1]  Jackson, J.D. (1975) Classical Electrodynamics. John Wiley, New York.
[2]  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_Hertz
[3]  Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M. (2005) The Classical Theory of Fields. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
[4]  Weinberg, S. (1995) The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. I. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[5]  Griffiths, D. (2008) Introduction to Elementary Particles. 2nd Edition, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
[6]  Schiff, L.I. (1955) Quantum Mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[7]  Patrignani, C., et al. (Particle Data Group) (2016) The Review of Particle Physics. Chinese Physics, 40, 100001. (2017 update)
http://pdg.lbl.gov/
[8]  Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M. (1959) Quantum Mechanics. Pergamon, London.
[9]  Wigner, E. (1939) On Unitary Representations of the Inhomogeneous Lorentz Group. Annals of Mathematics, 40, 149-204.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1968551
[10]  Schweber, S.S. (1964) An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Harper & Row, New York, 44-53.
[11]  Sternberg, S. (1994) Group Theory and Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 143-150.
[12]  Munoz, G. (1996) Lagrangian Field Theories and Energy-Momentum Tensors. American Journal of Physics, 64, 1153-1157.
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18336
[13]  Comay, E. (2018) A Consistent Construction of the Electromagnetic Energy-Momentum Tensor. Open Access Library Journal, 5, e4354.
https://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=82391
https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104354
[14]  Bethe, H.A. and Salpeter, E.E. (1957) Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms. Springer, Ber-lin.
[15]  Comay, E. (1991) Electromagnetic Energy-Momentum Tensor and Elementary Classical Point Charges. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 30, 1473-1487.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00675612
[16]  Aad, G., et al. (2016) Search for Magnetic Monopoles and Stable Particles with High Electric Charges in 8 TeV pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector. Physical Review D, 93, Article ID: 052009.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.052009
[17]  Comay, E. (1985) Will Magnetic Monopoles Be Detected in Our Instruments? Lettere al Nuovo Cimento, 43, 150-152.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02749596
[18]  Goddard, P. and Olive, D.I. (1978) Magnetic Monopoles in Gauge Field Theories. Reports on Progress in Physics, 41, 1357-1437.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/41/9/001
[19]  Comay, E. (1984) Axiomatic Deduction of Equations of Motion in Classical Electrodynamics. Il Nuovo Cimento B, 80, 159-168.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02722256
[20]  Comay, E. (1995) Charges, Monopoles and Duality Relations. Il Nuovo Cimento B, 110, 1347-1356.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723118
[21]  Bjorken, J.D. and Drell, S.D. (1965) Relativistic Quantum Fields. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[22]  Pohl, R., et al. (2010) The Size of the Proton. Nature, 466, 213-216.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09250
[23]  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyon
[24]  Halzen, F. and Martin, A.D. (1984) Quarks and Leptons: An Introductory Course in Modern Particle Physics. John Wiley, New York.
[25]  Perkins, D.H. (1987) Introduction to High Energy Physics. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park.
[26]  Bauer, T.H., Spital, R.D., Yennie, D.R. and Pipkin, F.M. (1978) The Hadronic Properties of the Photon in High-Energy Interactions. Reviews of Modern Physics, 50, 261.
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.50.261
[27]  Dirac, P.A.M. (1948) The Theory of Magnetic Poles. Physical Review Letters, 74, 817-830.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.74.817
[28]  Schwinger, J. (1968) Sources and Magnetic Charge. Physical Review, 173, 1536.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.173.1536
[29]  Schwinger, J. (1969) A Magnetic Model of Matter. Science, 165, 757-761.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.165.3895.757
[30]  Barut, A.O. (1971) Proton Form-Factor, Magnetic Charges, and Dyonium. Physical Review, D3, 1747-1750.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.3.1747
[31]  Comay, E. (2004) A Regular Theory of Magnetic Monopoles and Its Implications. In: Chubykalo, A., Onoochin, V., Espinoza, A. and Smirnov-Rueda, R., Eds., Has the Last Word Been Said on Classical Electrodynamics? Rinton Press, Paramus, 335.
[32]  Comay, E. (2012) The Regular Charge-Monopole Theory and Strong Interactions. Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics, 9, 93-118.
http://www.ejtp.com/articles/ejtpv9i26p93.pdf
[33]  Comay, O. (2014) Science or Fiction? The Phony Side of Particle Physics. S. Wachtman’s Sons.
[34]  Comay, E. (2015) Interrelations between Mathematics and Experiment in the Present Structure of Quantum Electrodynamics. OALibJ, 2, 1-6.
https://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=69004
[35]  Dirac, P.A.M. (1963) The Evolution of the Physicist’s Picture of Nature. Scientific American, 208, 45-53.
https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0563-45
[36]  Feynman, R.P. (1990) QED, the Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Penguin, London.
[37]  Ryder, L.H. (1997) Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cam-bridge.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413