全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Inter Observer Variability in the Specificity of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for External Impingement of the Shoulder—Is There Agreement among Radiologists?

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1103472, PP. 1-7

Subject Areas: Radiology & Medical Imaging

Keywords: Shoulder Pain, Impingement, External Impingement, MRI Scanning in Shoulders, Shoulder Imaging, Specificity of MRI in External Impingement

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Purpose: External impingement in the shoulder is a condition characterised by tenderness in the antero-lateral aspect of the shoulder on arm elevation due to an absolute or relative decrease in the subacromial space. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently utilised to confirm the condition and rule out other differential diagnoses. We conducted a study to look at the inter observer variability in specificity of MRI scanning in impingement of the shoulder. Methods: Twenty-six shoulders aged between 20 and 34 who all presented with shoulder instability only were included in the study. Three experienced consultant musculoskeletal radiologists were then asked to comment on the presence or absence of impingement on reviewing their MRI scans. Results: Radiologist 1 (R1) diagnosed 7 shoulders with impingement and 19 shoulders without. Radiologist 2 (R2) observed that 13 shoulders had radiological signs of impingement and 13 did not, and radiologist 3 (R3) suspected impingement in 20 shoulders with 6 shoulders normal. For R1 and R2, the agreement was 0.58 with a kappa value of 0.16. Between R2 and R3, the agreement was also 0.58 with a kappa value of 0.16. Comparing R1 and R3, the agreement was 0.46 and the kappa value was 0.14. Across all three radiologists, there was agreement in 8 out of the 26 MRI scans (31%) but only in 4 out of the 26 (15.4%) did they all agree that impingement was not present. Conclusion: MRI should be used judiciously in the work up of patients with external impingement of the shoulder.

Cite this paper

Baraza, N. , Goswam, K. and Shahban, S. A. (2017). Inter Observer Variability in the Specificity of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for External Impingement of the Shoulder—Is There Agreement among Radiologists?. Open Access Library Journal, 4, e3472. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103472.

References

[1]  Landis, R.J. and Koch, G.G. (1977) The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
[2]  Edelson, G. and Teitz, C. (2000) Internal Impingement in the Shoulder. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 9, 308-315. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2000.105449
[3]  Roberts, C.S., Davila, J.N., Hushek, S.G., Tillett, E.D. and Corrigan, T.M. (2002) Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of the Subacromial Space in the Impingement Sign Positions. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 11, 595-599.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2002.127095
[4]  Ianotti, J.P., Zlatkin, M.B., Esterhai, J.L., Kressel, H.Y., Dalinka, M.K. and Spindler, K.P. (1991) Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Shoulder. Sensitivity, Specificity and Predictive Value. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery America, 73, 17-29.
https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199173010-00004
[5]  Nelson, M.C., Leather, G.P., Nirschl, R.P., Pettrone, F.A. and Freedman, M.T. (1991) Evaluation of the Painful Shoulder. A Prospective Comparison of MRI, Computerized Tomographic Arthrography, Ultrasonography and Operative Findings. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery America, 73, 707-716.
https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199173050-00009
[6]  Uri, D.S. (1997) MR Imaging of Shoulder Impingement in Rotator Cuff Disease. Ra- diologic Clinics of North America, 35, 77-96.
[7]  Bachman, G.F., Melzer, C., Heinrichs, C.M., Mohring, B. and Rominger, M.B. (1997) Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Lesions: Comparison of US and MRI on 38 Joint Specimens. European Radiology, 7, 192-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050133
[8]  Torstenten, T.C. and Hollinshead, R.M. (1999) Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopy in the Evaluation of Shoulder Pathology. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 8, 42-45.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90053-8
[9]  White, E.A., Schweitzer, M.E. and Haims, A.H. (2006) Range of Normal and Abnormal Subacromial/Subdeltoid Bursa Fluid. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 30, 316-320.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200603000-00030
[10]  Mayerhoefer, M.E., Breitenseher, M.J., Wurnig, C., et al. (2009) Shoulder Impingement: Relationship of Clinical Symptoms and Imaging Criteria. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 19, 83-89. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0b013e318198e2e3
[11]  Cuomo, F., Kummer, F.J., Zuckerman, J.D., et al. (1998) The Influence of Acromioclavicular Joint Morphology on Rotator Cuff Tears. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 7, 555-559.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(98)90000-3
[12]  Neer, C.S. (1983) Impingement Lesions. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 173, 70-77.
[13]  Bigliani, L.U. (1991) Impingement Syndrome: Etiology and Overview. In: Watson M.S., Ed., Surgical Disorders of the Shoulder, Churchill Livingstone, New York, 237-246.
[14]  Bigliani, L.U., Morrison, D.S. and April, E.W. (1986) The Morphology of the Acro- mion and Its Relationship to Rotator Cuff Tears. Orthopaedic Transactions, 10, 228.
[15]  Davlin, C.D. and Fluker, D. (2003) Bilateral Os Acromiale in a Division I Basketball Player. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2, 175-179.
[16]  Sein, M.L., Walton, J., Linklater, J., et al. (2007) Reliability of MRI Assessment of Supraspinatus Tendinopathy. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41, e9.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2006.034421
[17]  Manvar, A.M., Kamireddi, A., Bhalani, S.M., et al. (2009) Clinical Significance of Intramuscular Cysts in the Rotator Cuff and Their Relationship to Full and Partial- Thickness Rotator cuff Tears. American Journal of Roentgenology, 192, 719-724.
https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3727
[18]  Erickson, S.J., Cox, I.H., Hyde, J.S., et al. (1991) Effect of Tendon Orientation of MR Imaging Signal Intensity: A Manifestation of the “Magic Angle” Phenomenon. Radiology, 181, 389-392.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.181.2.1924777
[19]  Graichen, H., Bonel, H., Stammberger, T., Englmeier, K.H., Reiser, M. and Eckstein, F. (2001) Sex-Specific Differences of Subacromial Space Width during Abduction, with and without Muscular Activity, and Correlation with Anthropometric Variables. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 10, 129-135.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2001.112056
[20]  Bakeman, R., Quera, V., McArthur, D. and Robinson, B.F. (1997) Detecting Sequen- tial Patterns and Determining Their Reliability with Fallible Observers. Psychological Methods, 2, 357-370.
https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.4.357

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413