全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Study on the Subjectivity of Students in English Teaching

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1102783, PP. 1-7

Subject Areas: Education, Linguistics

Keywords: Subjectivity, Subjectivity Education, Subjectivity Learning Strategy, Mode of Dulangkou

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

In modern educational fields, the quality education is put more weight, which aims to reduce the heavy homework burden of students and enhance the quality of students and the mass of education. Some theories, such as the constructivism learning theory and cognition education, are put forward and used fully. In the reform, the Dulangkou Middle School has created a unique teaching mode. The impact of the mode is very extensive, and it upsurges the thinking for subjectivity education and subjectivity learning strategies. The theses, at first, state some concepts, such as the subjectivity education and the subjectivity learning strategy, and survey and analyze the problems in the traditional English classroom teaching, and then analyze the teaching mode of Dulangkou. Through contrasting and analyzing the problems in the traditional English classroom teaching and creative methods of Dulangkou, some knowledge about the meaning of developing the subjectivity of students is put forward to further explore how to develop the subjectivity of students.

Cite this paper

Ge, Y. (2016). Study on the Subjectivity of Students in English Teaching. Open Access Library Journal, 3, e2783. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102783.

References

[1]  Humm, M. (1989) Subjects in English: Autobiography, Women and Education. In: Thompson, A. and Wilcox, H., Eds., Teaching Women: Feminism and English Studies, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 39-49.
[2]  Kristeva, J. (1980) Desire in Language. Trans. L. S. Roudiez, Columbia University Press, New York.
[3]  Kelly, U. (1990) Who Is Subject to What? ELT Journal, 23, 12-34.
[4]  Wenden, W. and Rubin, L. (1987) Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Modern Language Journal, 74, 79-86.
[5]  Lightbown, P. and Spada, N. (1993) How Languages Are Learned. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[6]  Zhang, T.B. (2000) Subjectivity Education Theory. Education Science Press.
[7]  Wenden, A. (1991) Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy. Prentice Hall, New York,
[8]  Skehan, P. (1988) Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. Routledge Press, London.
[9]  Yang, X.W. (1900) Modernization and Subjectivity. Educational Research, No. 7, 40-44.
[10]  McDevitt, B. (1997) Learner Autonomy and the Need for Learner Training. Language Learning Journal, 16, 34-39.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09571739785200251
[11]  Widdowson, H.G. (1990) Linguistics. The University Press, Oxford.
[12]  Karajeva, T. (2001) Conditions for Second Language Leaning. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[13]  Little (1990) Where Is the Mind? Constructive and Social Culture Perspectives on Mathematical Development. ELT Journal, 32, 12-16.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413