全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Implementing a Service of Independent Living Using a Participatory Approach

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1102591, PP. 1-10

Subject Areas: Education, Sociology

Keywords: Participatory Approach, Independent Living, Autonomy, Living Lab, Vulnerable Groups

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

This paper presents a case study about the implementation of a service of independent living using a participatory approach. The service promoted living experiences in apartments with innovative activities, characterized by means for the development of personal autonomy addressed to persons with disabilities and older persons. The paper shows the methodology applied, the experimentation process and the lessons learnt from the experience. Realized in the framework of the doctoral thesis titled “Social inclusion of vulnerable groups through participatory and emancipatory approaches. Implementing active citizenship and socially innovative actions in the framework of civil & human rights model of disability”. The implementation of the service has allowed demonstrating the initial research hypothesis according to which “an open participation in the co-creation of a service makes life easier for vulnerable groups”, gaining more knowledge about how to involve vulnerable groups as co-creators of services. This aspect can support the shift from situations based only on medical approach (passive situation), towards ones based on human rights (active situation). Placing the person with her/his needs, desires, objectives and expectations at the centre of actions and interventions.

Cite this paper

Traina, I. (2016). Implementing a Service of Independent Living Using a Participatory Approach. Open Access Library Journal, 3, e2591. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102591.

References

[1]  Bjorgvinsson, E., Ehn, P. and Hillgren, P. (2010) Participatory Design and “Democratizing Innovation”. Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, ACM, New York, 41-50.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900448
[2]  Yin, R.K. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 109-140.
[3]  Flyvbierg, B. (2006) Five Misunderstandings About Case Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219-245.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
[4]  George, A.L. and Bennett, A. (2004) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (BCSIA Studies in International Security). The MIT Press.
[5]  Gerrin, J. (2006) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press, New York.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803123
[6]  Aragall, F., et al. (2003) European Concept for Accessibility. Editor: Info Handicap. Luxembourg.
www.eca.lu
[7]  Aragall, F. and Montana, J. (2011) The H.U.M.B.L.E.S. Method for User-Centred Business. Gower Publishing Company, USA.
[8]  Forester, J., Pitt, J. and Welsh, J., Eds. (1993) Profiles of Participatory Action Researchers. Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca.
[9]  Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (2001) Participatory Action Research. In: Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y., Eds., The Hand- book of Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 567-605.
[10]  Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (2005) Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and the Public Sphere. In: Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y., Eds., The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 559-603.
[11]  Kemmis, S. (2006) Participatory Action Research and Public Sphere. Educational Action Research Journal, 14, 459-476.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09650790600975593
[12]  Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (2007) Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and the Public Sphere. In: Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y., Eds., Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 271-330.
[13]  Krishnaswamy, A. (2004) Participatory Research: Strategies and Tools. Practitioner: Newsletter of the National Network of Forest Practitioners, 22, 17-22.
[14]  Kusiak, A. (2007) Innovation: The Living Laboratory Perspective. Computer-Aided Design & Applications, 4, 863-876.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2007.10738518
[15]  Stahlbrost, A. (2008) Forming Future IT—The Living Lab Way of User Involvement. Lulea University of Technology, Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Division of Informatics, 2008:62.
[16]  Pallot, M. (2009) Engaging Users into Research and Innovation: The Living Lab Approach as a User Centred Open Innovation Ecosystem.
http://www.cwe-projects.eu/pub/bscw.cgi/1760838?id=715404_1760838
[17]  Mace, R.L., Hardie, G.J. and Place, J.P. (1996) Accessible Environments: Toward Universal Design. North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
[18]  McIntyre-Mills, J. (2010) Participatory Design for Democracy and Wellbeing: Narrowing the Gap between Service Outcomes and Perceived Needs. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23, 21-45.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11213-009-9145-9
[19]  Priestley, M., Waddington, L and Bessozi, C. (2010) New Priorities for Disability Research in Europe: Towards a User-Led Agenda. Disability & Society, 25, 731-746.
[20]  Tandon, R. (2005) Participatory Research. Revisiting the Roots. Mosaic Publications, New Delhi.
[21]  Wehmeyer, M.L. and Abery, B. (2013) Self-Determination and Choice. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 399-411.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-51.5.399
[22]  Quinn, G., Degener, T., Bruce, A., Burke, C., Castellino, J., Kenna, P., Kilkelly, U. and Quinlivan, S. (2002) Human Rights and Disability. The Current Use and Future Potential of United Nations Human Rights Instruments in the Context of Disability. United Nations, New York and Geneva.
[23]  Stein, M. (2007) Disability Human Rights. Faculty Publications. Paper 264.
http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/264
[24]  Markopoulos, P. and Rauterberg, G.W.M. (2000) Living Lab: A White Paper, 35, I. A. P. R.
[25]  Santoro, R. and Conte, R. (2009) Living Labs in Open Innovation Functional Regions. 15th International Conference on Concurrent Engineering (ICE 2009), Leiden, 22-24 June 2009.
[26]  Schumacher, J. and Feurstein, K. (2007) Living Labs—A New Multi-Stakeholder Approach to User Integration. 3rd International Conference on Interoperability of Enterprise Systems and Applications (I-ESA’07), Funchal, 26-30 March 2007.
[27]  Wessels, R., Persson, J., Lorensen, O., Andrich, R., Ferrario, M., Oortwijn, W., Van Beekum, T., Brodin, H. and de Witte, L. (2002) IPPA: Individually Prioritised Problem Assessment. Technology and Disability, 14, 141-145.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413