全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Adoption and Intensity of Row-Seeding (Case of Wolaita Zone)

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1102443, PP. 1-12

Subject Areas: Behavioral Economics, Socioeconomics

Keywords: Dependent Double Hurdle, Wolaita Zone, Row Seeding

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

In the context of Ethiopia, agriculture and specifically crop production take lion’s contribution, supporting the sector through introducing new agricultural technologies, like row planting in the recent times, boosts production. However, despite of such services, utilization of improved technologies remained low in Ethiopia. This study looks into the determinants of adoption and intensity of adoption of row planting using a survey data of 300 farming households in Wolaita zone. The survey indicates that about 87 percent of farmers adopt row planting in 2014/15 production year with mean intensity of use 2.33 Timad (about 56% of their total farm land). A dependent double hurdle analysis reveals that household being headed by Illiterate head, family size, Farm size, Annual off-farm income, Distance to nearest market and Training on row planting significantly influenced adoption and level of adoption of row planting. Moreover, adoption of row planting is significantly affected by Farming experience, No of information sources and Distance to Development Agent whereas level of adoption of row planting by livestock and Number of oxen. The study then concludes that the farmers’ adoption and level of adoption of row planting could be improved by raising farm household’s education, their off farm income, their endowment and by making them optimally mobilize their labor for agricultural activities and receive extension service. As a result, the study recommends local governments to work towards intensifying informal education to farming households in the study area, raising effort of investment to improve market access and enhancing agricultural extension services to farmers.

Cite this paper

Tafese, T. (2016). Adoption and Intensity of Row-Seeding (Case of Wolaita Zone). Open Access Library Journal, 3, e2443. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102443.

References

[1]  World Bank (2008) Agriculture Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. The World Bank, Washington DC.
[2]  FDRE Ministry of Finance and Economic Development (2010) Growth and Transformation Plan. Ministry of Finance and Economic Development, Addis Ababa.
[3]  Joachim, V., Mekdim, D., Bart, D. and Lemayehu, S.T. (2013) Scaling-Up Adoption of Improved Technologies: The Impact of the Promotion of Row Planting on Farmers’ Teff Yields in Ethiopia. LICOS Discussion Paper Series, Issue Discussion Paper 344/2013, 1-2.
[4]  CSA (2013) Agricultural Sample Survey Report on Farm Management Practice. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency, Addis Ababa.
[5]  Hassen, B., Bezabih, E., Belay, K. and Jema, H. (2012) Determinants of Chemical Fertilizer Technology Adoption in North Eastern Highlands of Ethiopia:the Double Hurdle Approach. Journal of Research in Economics and International Finance (JREIF), 1, 39-49.
[6]  MoARD (2012) Crop Production. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Addis Ababa.
[7]  Feder, G., Just, E.R. and Zilberman, D. (1982) Adoption of Agricultural Innovation in Developing Countries: A Survey. World Bank: Staff Working Papers, 542, 3.
[8]  Andrei, P. (2011) Agricultural Technology Adoption: Issues for Consideration When Scaling-Up. The Cornell Policy Review: Journal of the Cornell Institute for Public Affairs, 1.
[9]  Lee, D.R. and Neil, S. (2001) Explaining the Adoption and Disadoption of Sustainable Agriculture: The Case of Cover Crops in Northern Honduras. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 49, 793-820.
[10]  Berhanu, G. and Swinton, S.M. (2003) Investment in Soil Conservation in Northern Ethiopia: The Role of Land Tenure Security and Public Programme. Agricultural Economics, 29, 69-84.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2003.tb00148.x
[11]  Abay, A. and Assefa, A. (2004) The Role of Education on the Adoption of. Agricultural Economics, 30, 215-228.
[12]  Teklewold, H., Legesse, D., Alemu, Y. and Dana, N. (2006) Determinants of Adoption of Poultry Technology: A Double-Hurdle Approach. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 18.
[13]  Hailu, B. (2008) Adoption of Improved Teff and Wheat Production Technologies in Crop and Livestock Mixed Systems in Northern and Western Shewa Zones of Ethiopia. University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
[14]  Jaume, G. and Jose, L. (1992) A Cross Section Model with Zeros: An Application to the Demand for Tobacco. Economics Working Series Paper, 1-33.
[15]  Yu, B.X. and Alejandro, N.-P. (2014) Fertilizer Adoption in Ethiopia Cereal Production. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 6, 319-337.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/JDAE2013.0508
[16]  Cragg, J.G. (1971) Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods. Econometrica, 829-844.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1909582
[17]  Cooper, J.C. and Keim, R.W. (1996) Incentive Payments to Encourage Farmer Adption of Water Quality Protection Practices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78, 45-64.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1243778
[18]  Gebregziabher, G. and Holden, S. (2011) Does Irrigation Enhance and Food Deficits Discourage Fertilizer Adoption in Risky Environment? Evodence from Tigray. Ethiopian Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 514-528.
[19]  Shiferaw, K. and You (2008) Technology Adoption under Seed Access Constriants and the Economic Impacts of Improved Pigeonpea Varieties in Tanzania. Agricultural Economics, 39, 309-323.
[20]  Teklewold, D. and Yami, D. (2006) Determinants of Poultry Technology: A Double Hurdle Approach. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 18.
[21]  Jose, A. (1989) A Double Hurdle Model of Cigarette Consumptionn. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 4, 23-39.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jae.3950040103
[22]  Greene, W.H. (2000) Econometric Analysis. 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
[23]  Heckman, J.J. (1979) Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica, 47, 153-161.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912352
[24]  Abara, O.C. and Singh, S. (1993) Ethics and Biases in Technology Adoption: The Small Farm Argument. Technological Forecasting and Social Chang, 43, 289-300.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(93)90057-E
[25]  Asif, R.A., Puran, M., Siegfried, B.P. and Michael, S. (2012) Bt Cotton Adoption: A Double-Hurdle Approach for North Indian Farmers. AgBioForum, 15, 294-302.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413