全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Efficacy of Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) in Reducing Total Waiting Time at Warfarin Clinic of a District Hospital: A Cohort Study

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1102428, PP. 1-7

Subject Areas: Internal Medicine

Keywords: Warfarin, Doctors, Testing, Hospital, Waiting Time

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Introduction: This study was chosen due to long waiting time at various stages before doctors/ pharmacists saw patients at warfarin clinic. Objectives: The objectives are to identify stages contributing to waiting time and to assess efficacy of point-of-care testing (POCT) in reducing waiting time at warfarin clinic. Methodology: This study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 (pre intervention) consisted of 171 patients attending warfarin clinic over three weeks (06/04/2015-27/ 04/2015). Phase 2 (post intervention) consisted of 148 patients (26/10/2014-09/11/2015). Patients with rejected INR samples and multiple clinics on the same day were excluded. Data were analysed using SPSS 17. Results/Discussion: 171 patients were recruited in phase 1. 67.3% (115) Malays, 22.8% (39) Chinese, 9.4% (16) Indians and 0.6% (1) others. The mean age was 62.8 years. 54.4% (93) were males compared to 45.6% (78) females. Significant waiting time was from arrival of patient at venepuncture to blood taking which was 38.3 minutes ± 19.3, p < 0.001. Blood taken at venepuncture to sample arrive at laboratory was 29.1 minutes ± 13.9, p < 0.001. The mean time to see pharmacist was 44.2 minutes ± 24.5. The mean time to see doctor for both stable/deranged INR was 58.7 ± 27.1, p < 0.001. Average 36.7 minutes ± 23.8 was spent at doctor’s room, p < 0.001. Time spent from pharmacist receiving prescription to warfarin dispensed was 16.3 ± 7.2, p < 0.001. Percentage of patients with total waiting time in the post intervention study (arrival at venepuncture to dispensing of warfarin) less than 180 minutes is 96.7% (compared to 21.6% in the pre intervention group). The set standard is 80%. Causes contributing towards excessive waiting time were delay in transporting samples to laboratory, delay in blood taking at venepuncture, delay in sending results to warfarin clinic and poor delegation of task between doctors/pharmacists. The signifycant improvement in waiting time was attributed to the point-of-care testing (POCT) device which avoided the need to send samples to the laboratory. Conclusion: The point-of-care testing (POCT) system provides a reliable and accurate alternative in monitoring patients on oral anticoagulation therapy.

Cite this paper

Kasinathan, G. , Pairan, S. , Rowther, S. , Sulaiman, S. , Basimin, S. A. , Samsuni, N. and Balasegar, V. (2016). Efficacy of Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) in Reducing Total Waiting Time at Warfarin Clinic of a District Hospital: A Cohort Study. Open Access Library Journal, 3, e2428. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102428.

References

[1]  Mohebbifar, R., Hasanpoor, E., et al. (2014) Outpatient Waiting Time in Health Services and Teaching Hospitals: A Case Study in Iran. Global Journal of Health Sciences, 6, No. 1.
[2]  Dansky, K.H. and Miles, J. (2007) Patient Satisfaction with Ambulatory Healthcare Services: Waiting Time and Filling Time. Hospital and Health Services Administration, 42, 165
[3]  Boudreaux, E.D., D’Autremont, S., Wood, K., and Jones, G.N. (2004) Predictors of Emergency Department Patient Satisfaction: Stability over 17 Months. Academic Emergency Medicine, 11, 51-58.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2003.06.012
[4]  Abdullah, M.H. (2005) Study on Outpatients’ Waiting Time in Hospital Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (HUKM) Through the Six Sigma Approach 1. The Journal of the Department of Statistics, 1, 39-53.
[5]  Plüddemann, A., Thompson, M., Wolstenholme, J., Price, C.P. and Heneghan, C. (2012) Point-of-Care INR Coagulometers for Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulation: Primary Care Diagnostic Technology Update. The British Journal of General Practice, 62, e798-e800.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12x658476
[6]  Garcia-Alamino, J.M., Ward, A.M., Alonso-Coello, P., Perera, R., Bankhead, C., Fitzmaurice, D., et al. (2010) Self- Monitoring and Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, Article ID: CD003839.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003839.pub2
[7]  British Committee for Standards in Hematology (2011) Guidelines on Oral Anticoagulation (Warfarin). Fourth Edition, Blackwell Publishing Limited.
[8]  National Health Service (NHS Columbia) (2014) Guidelines for Anticoagulation.
[9]  Garwood, C.L., Baringhaus, S.N. and Laban, K.M. (2008) Quality of Anticoagulation Care in Patients Discharged from a Pharmacist Managed Anticoagulation Clinic after Stabilization of Warfarin Therapy. Pharmacotherapy, 28, 20- 26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1592/phco.28.1.20
[10]  Sharma, P., Scotland, G., Cruickshank, M., Tassie, E., Fraser, C., Burton, C., et al. (2015) The Clinical Effectiveness and cost-Effectiveness of Point-of-Care Tests (CoaguChek System, INRatio2 PT/INR Monitor and ProTime Microcoagulation System) for the Self-Monitoring of the Coagulation Status of People Receiving Long-Term Vitamin K Antagonist Therapy, Compared with Standard UK Practice: Systematic Review and Economic Evaluation. Health Technology Assessment, 19, No. 48.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/hta19480
[11]  NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency (2008) Buyers’ Guide: Point of Care Coagulometers for Monitoring Oral Anticoagulation. CEP 07026. Centre for Evidence-based Purchasing, London.
[12]  Christensen, T.D. and Larsen, T.B. (2012) Precision and Accuracy of Point-of-Care Testing Coagulometers Used for Self-Testing and Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulation Therapy. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 10, 251-260.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04568.x
[13]  Siebenhofer, A., Rakovac, I., Kleespies, C., et al. (2008) Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulation Reduces Major Outcomes in the Elderly. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 100, 1089-1098.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/th08-06-0361
[14]  National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2006) Atrial Fibrillation. Clinical Guideline CG36. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London.
http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG36/NICEGuidance/pdf/English
[15]  Gijo, E., Antony, J., Hernandez, J. and Scaria, J. (2013) Reducing Patient Waiting Time in a Pathology Department Using the Six Sigma Methodology. Leadership in Health Services, 26, 2-2.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413