The present manuscript mainly introduces three linguistic methods to
detect lies, namely Hand- writing Analysis, Voice Stress Analysis, and
Non-Verbal Analysis and the application of these linguistic deception detection
approaches in various fields, such as law enforcement, intelligence agencies, and
forensic context. These major deception detection techniques are illustrated by
examples based on graphology, psycho-physiological stress response, and
non-verbal communication studies.
De
Paulo, B.M., Lindsay, J.J., Malone, B.E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K. and
Cooper, H. (2003) Cues to Deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
Fitzpatrick, E. and Bachenko, J. (2009) Building a Forensic Corpus
to Test Language-Based Indicators of Deception. Language and Computers, 71, 183-196.
Fornaciari, T. and
Poesio, M. (2013) Automatic Deception Detection in Italian Court Cases. Artificial
Intelligence and Law, 21,
303-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-013-9140-4
Hancock, J.T., Curry, L.E.,
Goorha, S. and Woodworth, M. (2007) On Lying and Being Lied to: A Linguistic
Analysis of Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication. Discourse Process,
45, 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638530701739181
Newman,
M.L., Pennebaker, J.W., Berry, D.S. and Richards, J.M. (2003) Lying Words:
Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 29,
665-675. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029005010
Strapparava,
C. and Mihalcea, R. (2009) The Lie Detector: Explorations in the Automatic
Recognition of Deceptive Language. Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers,
Singapore, 4 August 2009, 309-312.
Frank, M.G., Menasco, M.A.
and O’Sullivan, M. (2008) Human Behavior and Deception Detection. In: Voeller,
J.G., Ed., Handbook of Science and Technology for Homeland Security,
Vol. 5, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470087923.hhs299
Toma, C.L. and Hancock, J.T. (2012) What
Lies Beneath: The Linguistic Traces of Deception in Online Dating Profiles. Journal of Communication, 62, 78-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01619.x
Palmatier, J.J. and Rovner, L. (2015) Credibility Assessment:
Preliminary Process Theory, the Polygraph Process, and Construct Validity. International Journal of Psychophysiology,
95, 3-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.06.001
Palmatier, J.J. and Rovner, L. (2015) Rejoinder to Commentary on Palmatier and Rovner (2014):
Credibility Assessment: Preliminary Process Theory, the Polygraph Process, and
Construct Validity. International Journal
of Psychophysiology, 95, 31-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.11.009
