Deception detection can be achieved through the following linguistic
method: Statement Analysis, which is illustrated by examples based
mainly on the theories in lexicology, syntax, graphology, psychophysiology,
kinesics, and cognition. The techniques are very significant to forensic
context, business negotiation, job/school interview, and may be widely applied
to law enforcement in crime investigation.
De
Paulo, B.M., Lindsay, J.J., Malone, B.E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K. and Cooper, H. (2003) Cues to Deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
Fornaciari, T. and Poesio, M. (2013) Automatic Deception
Detection in Italian Court Cases. Artificial
Intelligence and Law, 21, 303-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-013-9140-4
Hancock, J.T., Curry, L.E., Goorha, S. and Woodworth, M. (2007) On Lying and Being Lied to: A Linguistic
Analysis of Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication. Discourse Process,45, 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638530701739181
Newman, M.L., Pennebaker, J.W., Berry, D.S. and Richards, J.M. (2003) Lying Words: Predicting
Deception from Linguistic Styles. Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 665-675. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029005010
Strapparava, C. and Mihalcea, R. (2009) The Lie Detector: Explorations in the Automatic
Recognition of Deceptive Language. Proceedings
of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers, Singapore, 4 August 2009, 309-312.
Frank, M.G., Menasco, M.A. and O’Sullivan, M. (2008) Human Behavior and Deception Detection. In: Voeller, J.G., Ed.,Handbook of Science and Technology for
Homeland Security,
Vol. 5, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken.
Toma,
C.L. and Hancock, J.T. (2012) What Lies Beneath: The Linguistic Traces of Deception in
Online Dating Profiles. Journal of Communication,
62, 78-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01619.x
