Using collaborative autoethnography methods, this article presents the
exploration of three non- traditional doctoral student’s journey as they
evolved into a self-organized cohort. Individual processes involving
self-authorship, self-observation, personal reflections and analysis, combined
with group dialogues and conversations about the experience lead to a formed
sense of community amongst the researchers. Composite themes develop through a
collaborative analysis of individual personal narratives highlighting
significant learning experiences, adult development considerations, and the
culturally adaptive nature of non-traditional doctoral students that often remain
unexamined in other methodologies.
Cite this paper
Gleiman, A. , Knolton, D. and Mokhtarian, K. (2015). The Art of Collaborative Autoethnography: Exploring the Evolution of a Self-Organizing, Non-Traditional Doctoral Cohort. Open Access Library Journal, 2, e1634. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1101634.
Pappas, J.P. and Jerman, J. (2011) Topics for Current and Future Consideration. In: Pappas, J.P. and Jerman, J., Eds., Meeting Adult Learner Needs
through the Nontraditional Doctoral Degree, New Directions for the Adult
and Continuing Education, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ace.404
Barnett, B.G., Basom, M.R.,
Yerkes, D.M. and Norris, C.J. (2000) Cohorts in Educational Leadership
Programs: Benefits, Difficulties, and the Potential for developing School
Leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 255-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X00362005
Brown, C.J. (2011) Learning Communities or Support Groups: The Use
of Student Cohorts in Doctoral Educational Leadership
Programs. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database, Order No.
3453645.
Fitzpatrick, J.A. (2013) Doctoral Student Persistence in
Non-Traditional Cohort Programs: Examining Educationally Related Peer
Relationships, Students’ Understanding of Faculty Expectations,
and Student Characteristics. ProQuest
Dissertations and Theses Database, Order No.
3594664.
Hildebrandt, D.M. (2011) The Perceived Impact of Social Network Sites
on Online Doctoral Students’ Sense of Belonging ProQuest
Dissertations and Theses Database, Order No. 3453112.
Lange, N.D., Pillay, G. and Chikoko, V.
(2011) Doctoral Learning: A Case for a Cohort Model of Supervision and Support. South African Journal of Education, 31,
15-30.
Lei, S., Gorelick, D., Short, K., Smallwood,
L. and Wright-Porter, K. (2011) Academic Cohorts: Benefits and Drawbacks of Being a Member of a Community
of Learners. Education, 131, 497-504.
Santicola, L.L. (2011) Characteristics and Motivations That Led to Persistence
in Doctoral Cohort Study. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database, Order
No. 3528370.
Zahl, S.B.
(2013) The Role of Community for
Part-Time Doctoral Students: Exploring How Relationships Support Student
Persistence. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database,No. 3587513.
Sinnott, J.D. and Berlanstein, D. (2006) The Importance of Feeling Whole: Learning
to “Feel Connected”, Community, and Adult Development. In: Hoare, C., Ed., Handbook of Adult Development and Learning, Oxford
University Press, New York.
Magai,
C. and Haviland-Jones, J. (2002) The Hidden Genius of Emotion: Lifespan
Transformations of Personality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509575
Wenger,
E. (2010) Communities if Practice and Social Learning Systems: The Career of a Concept. In: Blackmore,
C. Ed., Social
Learning Systems and Communities of Practice, Springer-Verlag, London. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2_11
Eckert,
P. (2006) Communities
of Practice. In: Brown,
K., Ed., Encyclopedia of Language and
Linguistics, 2nd Edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 683-685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01276-1
Holman-Jones,
S. (2005) Auto Ethnography: Making the Personal Political. In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S., Eds., Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 763-791.
Toyosaki,
S., Pensoneau-Conway, S.L., Wendt, N.A. and Leathers, K. (2009) Community Autoethnography:
Compiling the Personal and Resituating Whiteness. Cultural Studies, Critical
Methologies, 9, 56-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532708608321498
Baxter Magolda, M. (2007)
Self-Authorship: The Foundation for Twenty-First Century Education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning,
109, 69-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.266
Beachboard,
M.R., Beachboard, J.C., Wenling, L. and Adkison, S.R. (2011) Cohorts and Relatedness: Self-Determi- nation
Theory as an Explanation of How Learning Communities Affect Educational
Outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 52, 853-874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9221-8
Stocker,
G. (2013, September) Using a Cohort Learning Model to Improve Learning in
Companies and Communities. Proceedings of the 32nd Research-to-Practice (R2P) Conference in Adult and Higher Education, St.
Charles, 20-21
September 2013, 20-21.
Moelker,
R. and Van Der Kloet, I. (2003) Military Families and the Armed Forces:
A Two-Sided Affair? In: Caforio, G., Ed., The Handbook of the
Sociology of the Military (201-224), Kluwer Academic/Plenum
Publishers, New York, 201-224.
McCarthy, J., Trenga, M.E. and Weiner, B. (2005) The Cohort Model with Graduate Student Learners
Faculty-Student Perspectives. Adult Learning, 16, 22-25.
