Social media sites like Buzzfeed and Twitter
provide significant opportunities for understanding circulation of meaning in
our contemporary media ecology. Aligning these social and viral media with
cultural productions and reproductions, we argue that Heidegger’s theoretical
frame of historiography illuminates the ways in which genres are created, memed
and mutated across the digital archive. A homological historiography, then,
highlights social and viral media as those that require constant feeding,
expanding the digital archive and calling upon scholars and lay audiences to
consider the limits of the form.
Cite this paper
Young, A. , Gunn, J. , Hoffman, J. and Brummett, B. (2015). Reading against the Digital Archive: Historiography and What Is Not. Open Access Library Journal, 2, e1387. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1101387.
Campbell, K.K. and Jamieson, K.H. (1978) Form and
Genre in Rhetorical Criticism: An Introduction. In: Campbell, K.K. and
Jamieson, K.H., Eds., Form and
Genre: Shaping Rhetorical Action, Speech Communication Association, Falls Church, 26.
Brummett,
B., Gunn, J., Hoffman, J. and Young, A. (2014) NSFW:
Experiencing Immanentism or Transcendence upon Hearing Gilbert Gottfried’s Rendition of Fifty Shades of Grey in the
Postmodern Workplace, Or Liberatory Criminology. Science
Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 2014,
Article ID:
sjsa-235.
Tetlock, P., Lebow, R. and Parker, G. (2006) Unmaking the West: “What-If?” Scenarios
That Rewrite World History. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 45.