A Cross Sectional Study: Availability of Improved Sanitation Facilities and Associated Factors among Rural Communities in Lemo Woreda, Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia
Background: Faecal-oral diseases represent the largest
health burden associated with a lack of improved sanitation. Diarrhea is the most
burdensome of these and accounting for over millions of deaths each year. Access
to improved household sanitary facilities have great health benefits ranging from
reductions in diarrhea, helmenth infections and trachoma through reduced risk of
accidents and enhanced psychosocial well-being. Objective: This study was aimed
at assessing the availability of improved sanitation facilities and factors affecting
it among rural communities in Lemo Woreda of Hadiya zone in 2014. Methods: Community
based cross-sectional study was conducted from March to April, 2014 in Lemo Woreda,
Hadiya Zone. To draw a total sample of
size 515, a multistage sampling technique was used. Heads of the households or their spouses were interviewed to collect data using structured,
pretested questionnaire. Data were entered using Epi-Data version 3.1 and
exported to SPSS version 16 for analysis. Binary logistic regression was used to
predict variables which have independent association with outcome variables. Results:
The findings of this study showed that 35.9% (95%CI: 30.9%, 40.9%) of the households
included in the study had improved sanitation facilities. The likelihood of improved
sanitation facility was 2.3 fold higher in households that had a higher income than
those with lower income (AOR: 2.346 (1.483, 3.714)). The odds of having improved
sanitation facilities was 6.5 folds higher in households headed by government
employers/students as compared to households headed by farmers (AOR: 6.521, 95%CI:
(2.216, 19.188)). Respondents who had sufficient knowledge on improved sanitation
facilities were 1.6 times more likely to have improved sanitation facilities as
those who had insufficient knowledge on improved sanitation facilities (AOR: 1.606,
95%CI: (1.022, 2.253)). Respondents who had positive attitude towards improved sanitation
facilities were 2 times more likely to had improved sanitation facilities as those
who had negative attitude towards improved sanitation facilities (AOR: 1.989, 95%CI:
(1.250, 3.165)). Conclusions: The findings of this study showed that 35.9% (95%CI:
30.9%, 40.9%) of the households included in the study had improved sanitation facilities.
Income of the household, occupation of the respondents, knowledge and atti- tude
of the respondents towards improved sanitation were the major factors affecting
availability of improved sanitation facilities. Therefore, it is recommended that
continuous education on im- proved sanitation facilities should be provided to rural
communities and special attention should be given to farmers.
Cite this paper
Yohannes, T. , Workicho, A. and Asefa, H. (2014). A Cross Sectional Study: Availability of Improved Sanitation Facilities and Associated Factors among Rural Communities in Lemo Woreda, Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Open Access Library Journal, 1, e1020. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1101020.
Mary Charlotte Spencer (2012) Sanitation Practices and Preferences in
Peri-Urban Accra, Ghana. Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta.
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Program for
Water Supply and Sanitation (2013) Progress
on Drinking Water and Sanitation: Special Focus on Sanitation. UNICEF, New York
and WHO, Geneva.
Legesse, W.,
Haile Mariam, D. and Kloos, H.
(2006) Water
Supply and Sanitation. In: Berhane, Y., Haile Mariam, D.
and Kloos, H., Eds., Epidemiology
and Ecology of Health and Disease in Ethiopia, Shama Books, Addis Ababa, 129- 146.
Water and
Sanitation Program (WSP) (2011) Scaling up Rural
Sanitation, Long Term Sustainability of Improved Sanitation in Rural Bangladesh. World Bank, Washington DC.
Kema, K., Semali, I., Mkuwa, S., Kagonji, I., Temu, F., Ilako, F. and Mkuye, M. (2012) Factors Affecting the Utilization
of Improved Ventilated Latrines among Communities in Mtwara Rural District,
Tanzania. The Pan African Medical Journal, 13, 4.
Awoke, W. and Muche, S. (2013) A Cross Sectional Study: Latrine Coverage and Associated
Factors among Rural Communities
in the District of Bahir Dar Zuria, Ethiopia. BMC Public Health, 13, 99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-99
Regassa,
N., Rajan, D.S. and Ketsela, K. (2011) Access to, and Utilization of Information on
Sanitation and Hygieneby Rural Households in Alaba Special District, Southern
Ethiopia. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 33, 101-112.
Robert, M. and Kusiima, B.A. (1998) Community Use of Pit-Latrines in Mubende District,
Assisted by Child Health and Development Centre Ministry of Health, Health
Planning Department, Uganda National Health Research Organization
and UNICEF. Uganda
National Health Research Organization, Kampala and UNICEF, New York.
Phaswana-Mafuya, N. and Shukla, N. (2005) Factors That Could Motivate People to Adopt
Safe Hygienic Practices in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. African Health Sciences, 5, 21-28.
Prasetyoputra, P. and Irianti, S. (2013) Access to Improved
Sanitation Facilities in Indonesia: An Econometric Analysis of Geographical and
Socioeconomic Disparities. Journal of Applied Sciences in Environmental
Sanitation, 8, 215- 224.
Gathuo, B. (2004) Sanitation and Hygiene in Kenya: Lessons on
What Drives Demand for Improved Sanitation, Water and Sanitation Program (WSP). WSP Global, Canada.
Güllemann, H. (2010) Characteristics of Subsidized Latrines in Rural
Cambodia, a Deep Look into the Database of the MRD KAP Survey. SNV
Working Paper, Amsterdam
Jenkins, D.C. (2010) Examining
the Influence of Economic and Political Factors upon Access to Improved Water
and Sanitation in Select African Nations, 2005-2008. Public Health Thesis, Georgia State
University, Atlanta, 84.