Publish in OALib Journal

ISSN: 2333-9721

APC: Only $99


Search Results: 1 - 6 of 6 matches for " undecidability "
All listed articles are free for downloading (OA Articles)
Page 1 /6
Display every page Item
On the Philosophical Import of Some Accomplishments of Newton da Costa
Marcel Guillaume
Principia : an International Journal of Epistemology , 2011,
Abstract: From Newton da Costa’s works, many people in France know only the revival of paraconsistency. We give some reasons in defence of investigations in this part of logic. But above all we recall one of the major contributions of Newton da Costa: his proof, in 1991, in collaboration with Doria, of the g delian undecidability of motion in mathematical physics, a result which was somewhat foreseen on other grounds by Duhem in 1906.
A Proof of Syntactic Incompleteness of the Second-Order Categorical Arithmetic  [PDF]
Giuseppe Raguní
Open Access Library Journal (OALib Journal) , 2017, DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1103969
Actually, Arithmetic is considered as syntactically incomplete. However, there are different types of arithmetical theories. One of the most important is the second-order Categorical Arithmetic (AR), which interprets the principle of induction with the so-called full semantics. Now, whoever concluded that AR is sintactically (or semantically, since categoricity implies equivalence of the two types of completeness) incomplete? Since this theory is not effectively axiomatizable, the incompleteness Theorems cannot be applied to it. Nor is it legitimate to assert that the undecidability of the statements is generally kept in passing from a certain theory (such as PA) to another that includes it (such as AR). Of course, although the language of AR is semantically incomplete, this fact does not imply that the same AR is semantically/sintactically incomplete. Pending a response to the previous question, this paper aims to present a proof of the syntactic/semantical incompleteness of AR, by examples based on the different modes of representation (i.e. codes) of the natural numbers in computation.
Une impossible exhaustivité. Poétique du lieu dans Villa Bunker de Sébastien Brebel
Marie-Hélène Voyer
Temps Zéro : Revue d'étude des écritures Contemporaines , 2013,
Abstract: Par l’analyse du roman Villa Bunker (2009) de Sébastien Brebel, l’auteure trace les jalons d’une poétique de l’espace incertain qui s’érigerait sur un principe d’indécidabilité et d’illisibilité. L’étude de la représentation spatiale et l’analyse de l’action permettent, dans un premier temps, de voir comment l’espace s’y présente comme un lieu marqué par les brouillages de la perception et de l’oubli. Puis, sont examinées les modalités stylistiques (formes de l’excès et du ressassement) et narratives (instabilité de l’origine énonciative, autorité narrative ambigu ) de cette poétique de l’espace qui traduit à la fois les vertiges de l’interprétation et la problématicité de tout procès perceptif.Through an analysis of Sebastien Brebel’s novel Villa Bunker (2009), the author outlines a poetics of uncertain spaces erected upon a principle of undecidability and illegibility. Firstly, the study of spatial representation and analysis of action allow us to see how space in the novel is presented as being affected by the blurring effects of perception and forgetfulness. Subsequently, this paper examines the stylistic terms (forms of excess and iteration) and narrative aspects (instability of the enunciative source; ambiguous narrative authority) of this poetics of space, a poetics that translates both the vertigo of interpretation and the problematical nature of any perceptual process.
On Ambiguity and Two Arguments from Ambiguity
Drazen Pehar
Prolegomena , 2005,
Abstract: The author explores and criticises two arguments from ambiguity: S. Pinker’s argument from ambiguity in support of the ‘Language of Thought’ hypothesis, and the argument from ambiguity proposed by K. P. Parsons against Davidsonian ‘semantics of truth-conditions’. Leaning primarily on G. Harman and D. Davidson he aims to demonstrate that the Pinker/Parsons arguments share a common strategy, on the one hand, and imply and/or suggest, as he claims, an implausible view of ambiguity, on the other. Discussing Pinker’s argument he further attempts to elucidate the ways in which the modifications of public and inter-subjectively accessible aspects of the use of language reflect the differences in interpretations of an ambiguity. His exploration of the argument against ‘semantics of truth-conditions’ then aims to explain, contra Parsons, the sense in which talk about the truth conditions for ambiguity does not implicate a threat to Davidson’s perspective on the theory of meaning. Finally, the author argues for the view of ambiguity as a kind of ignorance/undecidability that, as he contends, represents both more realistic and more plausible theoretical option than the one on which both Pinker and Parsons found their arguments and which also comes out in Aristotle (under an interpretation), K. Bach and W. Lycan.
Grand Challenges for Computational Intelligence
Mikhail Prokopenko
Frontiers in Robotics and AI , 2014, DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2014.00002
Some Undecidable Problems on Approximability of NP Optimization Problems

计算机科学技术学报 , 1996,
Abstract: In this paper some undecidable problems on approximability of NP op-timization problems are investigated. In particular, the following problems are all undecidable: (1) Given an NP optimization problem, is it approal-mable in polynomial time? (2) For any polynomialtime computable function r(n), given a polynomial time approkimable NP optimization problem, has it a polynomialtime approximation algorithm with approkimation performance ratio r(n) (r(n)-approkimable)? (3) For any polynomial-time computable func-tions r(n), r'(n), where r'(n) < r(n) a.e., given an r(n)-approkimable NP opti-mization problem, is it r'(n)-approalmable?
Page 1 /6
Display every page Item

Copyright © 2008-2017 Open Access Library. All rights reserved.