Publish in OALib Journal

ISSN: 2333-9721

APC: Only $99


Search Results: 1 - 3 of 3 matches for " Jamaria Bohanon "
All listed articles are free for downloading (OA Articles)
Page 1 /3
Display every page Item
Within-Subject Interlaboratory Variability of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube Tests
William C. Whitworth, Lanette R. Hamilton, Donald J. Goodwin, Carlos Barrera, Kevin B. West, Laura Racster, Laura J. Daniels, Stella O. Chuke, Brandon H. Campbell, Jamaria Bohanon, Atheer T. Jaffar, Wanzer Drane, David Maserang, Gerald H. Mazurek
PLOS ONE , 2012, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043790
Abstract: Background The QuantiFERON?-TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-GIT) is a viable alternative to the tuberculin skin test (TST) for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. However, within-subject variability may limit test utility. To assess variability, we compared results from the same subjects when QFT-GIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were performed in different laboratories. Methods Subjects were recruited at two sites and blood was tested in three labs. Two labs used the same type of automated ELISA workstation, 8-point calibration curves, and electronic data transfer. The third lab used a different automated ELISA workstation, 4-point calibration curves, and manual data entry. Variability was assessed by interpretation agreement and comparison of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) measurements. Data for subjects with discordant interpretations or discrepancies in TB Response >0.05 IU/mL were verified or corrected, and variability was reassessed using a reconciled dataset. Results Ninety-seven subjects had results from three labs. Eleven (11.3%) had discordant interpretations and 72 (74.2%) had discrepancies >0.05 IU/mL using unreconciled results. After correction of manual data entry errors for 9 subjects, and exclusion of 6 subjects due to methodological errors, 7 (7.7%) subjects were discordant. Of these, 6 (85.7%) had all TB Responses within 0.25 IU/mL of the manufacturer's recommended cutoff. Non-uniform error of measurement was observed, with greater variation in higher IFN-γ measurements. Within-subject standard deviation for TB Response was as high as 0.16 IU/mL, and limits of agreement ranged from ?0.46 to 0.43 IU/mL for subjects with mean TB Response within 0.25 IU/mL of the cutoff. Conclusion Greater interlaboratory variability was associated with manual data entry and higher IFN-γ measurements. Manual data entry should be avoided. Because variability in measuring TB Response may affect interpretation, especially near the cutoff, consideration should be given to developing a range of values near the cutoff to be interpreted as “borderline,” rather than negative or positive.
Variability of the QuantiFERON?-TB Gold In-Tube Test Using Automated and Manual Methods
William C. Whitworth, Donald J. Goodwin, Laura Racster, Kevin B. West, Stella O. Chuke, Laura J. Daniels, Brandon H. Campbell, Jamaria Bohanon, Atheer T. Jaffar, Wanzer Drane, Paul A. Sjoberg, Gerald H. Mazurek
PLOS ONE , 2014, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086721
Abstract: Background The QuantiFERON?-TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-GIT) detects Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection by measuring release of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) when T-cells (in heparinized whole blood) are stimulated with specific Mtb antigens. The amount of IFN-γ is determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Automation of the ELISA method may reduce variability. To assess the impact of ELISA automation, we compared QFT-GIT results and variability when ELISAs were performed manually and with automation. Methods Blood was collected into two sets of QFT-GIT tubes and processed at the same time. For each set, IFN-γ was measured in automated and manual ELISAs. Variability in interpretations and IFN-γ measurements was assessed between automated (A1 vs. A2) and manual (M1 vs. M2) ELISAs. Variability in IFN-γ measurements was also assessed on separate groups stratified by the mean of the four ELISAs. Results Subjects (N = 146) had two automated and two manual ELISAs completed. Overall, interpretations were discordant for 16 (11%) subjects. Excluding one subject with indeterminate results, 7 (4.8%) subjects had discordant automated interpretations and 10 (6.9%) subjects had discordant manual interpretations (p = 0.17). Quantitative variability was not uniform; within-subject variability was greater with higher IFN-γ measurements and with manual ELISAs. For subjects with mean TB Responses ±0.25 IU/mL of the 0.35 IU/mL cutoff, the within-subject standard deviation for two manual tests was 0.27 (CI95 = 0.22–0.37) IU/mL vs. 0.09 (CI95 = 0.07–0.12) IU/mL for two automated tests. Conclusion QFT-GIT ELISA automation may reduce variability near the test cutoff. Methodological differences should be considered when interpreting and using IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs).
Finite Groups With Maximal Normalizers I
Joseph Bohanon
Mathematics , 2009,
Abstract: We examine $p$-groups with the property that every non-normal subgroup has a normalizer which is a maximal subgroup. In particular we show that for such a $p$-group $G$, when $p=2$, the center of $G$ has index at most 16 and when $p$ is odd the center of $G$ has index at most $p^3$.
Page 1 /3
Display every page Item

Copyright © 2008-2017 Open Access Library. All rights reserved.