Publish in OALib Journal
APC: Only $99
my present study, I elaborate different types of management, management staffs,
types of managers and leaders along with their capacities of work and their
roles in any organization or institute to achieve the
desired goal with the help of employees. A study found that most of the CEOs of
the 62 major US-based companies spent at least 10 percent of their time in quality
enhancement efforts. The critical importance of employees’ involvement in the
quality process of an organization is based on the belief that the best process
innovation ideas come from the people actually doing the job. Employee
involvement in quality efforts can only come about when the employees know that
the organization cares for them. Best companies do not just confine education
and training to their shop floor employees and managers. Top executives are
actively involved in the learning process themselves. Training is the key
element of management system. For the smooth run of any organization we always
need proper training for all employees including leadership authority.
Certain difficulties are inherent in the implementation of the improvement of the quality of service, particularly in the Design Management Department. There is often a difference on the issue of translating vision between senior management and Design Department for service improvement into effective, operational QI programs. Middle managers have a key role to play, but often they are overlooked which leads to undermining their efforts to improve the quality programs offered by senior management. This paper describes the first phase of a PhD research project to determine and develop the role of middle management in successful implementation of quality management programs. A framework for quality improvement implementation, including key issues of importance to middle managers regarding their proactive involvement in QI, is suggested. Finally, the initial implementation of the model in a company is discussed.
This paper discerns the
socio-economic interests and environmental impacts generated by the projects of
an industrial nature. Research has highlighted the traditional approach adoption
that neglects the impact assessment of which environmental issues are causing in-depth
imbalance between economic growth and environmental disaster threatening human life.
The sustainable development principle requires the equitable distribution of the
newly created wealth owing to economic growth in social and environmental fields.
Hence, a new approach in accordance with the requirements of sustainable development
should be recommended from the projects’ design until their terms. This paper discusses
the major challenges in the context of reorient to construction projects both in
a conception stage than in the execution progress according to the sustainable development
principle. An approach to this case study is the research method advocated. Traceability
analysis and especially the followed of products sold by CCTEC Co. Ltd. have enabled
to bring out on the one hand the four projects induced by products CCTEC Co. Ltd.:
residential, public sector, industry and trade the other hand to measure the performance
attributed by these projects. Research results show that economic performance is
largely award winning without much concern to social and environmental performance.
This situation suggests the revision of product design and production traceability
in accordance with the sustainability of the project.