Search Results: 1 - 10 of 100 matches for " "
All listed articles are free for downloading (OA Articles)
Page 1 /100
Display every page Item
Surface bundles versus Heegaard splittings  [PDF]
David Bachman,Saul Schleimer
Mathematics , 2002,
Abstract: This paper studies Heegaard splittings of surface bundles via the curve complex of the fibre. The translation distance of the monodromy is the smallest distance it moves any vertex of the curve complex. We prove that the translation distance is bounded above in terms of the genus of any strongly irreducible Heegaard splitting. As a consequence, if a splitting surface has small genus compared to the translation distance of the monodromy, the splitting is standard.
Mapping class groups of Heegaard splittings of surface bundles  [PDF]
Jesse Johnson
Mathematics , 2012,
Abstract: Every surface bundle with genus $g$ fiber has a canonical Heegaard splitting of genus $2g+1$. We classify the mapping class groups of such Heegaard splittings in the case when the surface bundle has a sufficiently complicated monodromy map.
On the disk complexes of weakly reducible, unstabilized Heegaard splittings of genus three III - Generalized Heegaard splittings and mapping classes  [PDF]
Jungsoo Kim
Mathematics , 2015,
Abstract: Let $M$ be an orientable, irreducible $3$-manifold admitting a weakly reducible genus three Heegaard splitting as a minimal genus Heegaard splitting. In this article, we prove that if $[f]$, $[g]\in Mod(M)$ give the same correspondence between two isotopy classes of generalized Heegaard splittings consisting of two Heegaard splittings of genus two, say $[\mathbf{H}]\to[\mathbf{H}']$, then there exists a representative $h$ of the difference $[h]=[g]\cdot[f]^{-1}$ such that (i) $h$ preserves a suitably chosen embedding of the Heegaard surface $F'$ obtained by amalgamation from $\mathbf{H}'$ which is a representative of $[\mathbf{H}']$ and (ii) $h$ sends a uniquely determined weak reducing pair $(V',W')$ of $F'$ into itself up to isotopy. Moreover, for every orientation-preserving automorphism $\tilde{h}$ satisfying the previous conditions (i) and (ii), there exist two elements of $Mod(M)$ giving correspondence $[\mathbf{H}]\to[\mathbf{H}']$ such that $\tilde{h}$ belongs to the isotopy class of the difference between them.
(Disk, Essential surface) pairs of Heegaard splittings that intersect in one point  [PDF]
Jung Hoon Lee
Mathematics , 2008,
Abstract: We consider a Heegaard splitting M=H_1 \cup_S H_2 of a 3-manifold M having an essential disk D in H_1 and an essential surface F in H_2 with |D \cap F|=1. (We require that boundary of F is in S when H_2 is a compressionbody with non-empty "minus" boundary.) Let F be a genus g surface with n boundary components. From S, we obtain a genus g(S)+2g+n-2 Heegaard splitting M=H'_1 \cup_S' H'_2 by cutting H_2 along F and attaching F \times [0,1] to H_1. As an application, by using a theorem due to Casson and Gordon, we give examples of 3-manifolds having two Heegaard splittings of distinct genera where one of the two Heegaard splittings is a strongly irreducible non-minimal genus splitting and it is obtained from the other by the above construction.
Haken spheres for genus two Heegaard splittings  [PDF]
Sangbum Cho,Yuya Koda
Mathematics , 2015,
Abstract: A manifold which admits a reducible genus-$2$ Heegaard splitting is one of the $3$-sphere, $S^2 \times S^1$, lens spaces or their connected sums. For each of those splittings, the complex of Haken spheres is defined. When the manifold is the $3$-sphere, $S^2 \times S^1$ or the connected sum whose summands are lens spaces or $S^2 \times S^1$, the combinatorial structure of the complex has been studied by several authors. In particular, it was shown that those complexes are all contractible. In this work, we study the remaining cases, that is, when the manifolds are lens spaces. We give a precise description of each of the complexes for the genus-$2$ Heegaard splittings of lens spaces. A remarkable fact is that the complexes for most lens spaces are not contractible and even not connected.
3-Manifolds with irreducible Heegaard splittings of high genus  [PDF]
Martin Lustig,Yoav Moriah
Mathematics , 1998,
Abstract: Non-isotopic Heegaard splittings of non-minimal genus were known previously only for very special 3-manifolds. We show in this paper that they are in fact a wide spread phenomenon in 3-manifold theory: We exhibit a large class of knots and manifolds obtained by Dehn surgery on these knots which admit such splittings. Many of the manifolds have irreducible Heegaard splittings of arbitrary large genus. All these splittings are horizontal and are isotopic, after one stabilization, to a multiple stabilization of certain canonical low genus vertical Heegaard splittings.
Stabilizations of Heegaard splittings of sufficiently complicated 3-manifolds (Preliminary Report)  [PDF]
David Bachman
Mathematics , 2008,
Abstract: We construct families of manifolds that have pairs of genus $g$ Heegaard splittings that must be stabilized roughly $g$ times to become equivalent. We also show that when two unstabilized, boundary-unstabilized Heegaard splittings are amalgamated by a "sufficiently complicated" map, the resulting splitting is unstabilized. As a corollary, we produce a manifold that has distance one Heegaard splittings of arbitrarily high genus. Finally, we show that in a 3-manifold formed by a sufficiently complicated gluing, a low genus, unstabilized Heegaard splitting can be expressed in a unique way as an amalgamation over the gluing surface.
Genus two Heegaard splittings of orientable three-manifolds  [PDF]
J. Hyam Rubinstein,Martin Scharlemann
Mathematics , 1997,
Abstract: It was shown by Bonahon-Otal and Hodgson-Rubinstein that any two genus-one Heegaard splittings of the same 3-manifold (typically a lens space) are isotopic. On the other hand, it was shown by Boileau, Collins and Zieschang that certain Seifert manifolds have distinct genus-two Heegaard splittings. In an earlier paper, we presented a technique for comparing Heegaard splittings of the same manifold and, using this technique, derived the uniqueness theorem for lens space splittings as a simple corollary. Here we use a similar technique to examine, in general, ways in which two non-isotopic genus-two Heegard splittings of the same 3-manifold compare, with a particular focus on how the corresponding hyperelliptic involutions are related.
Are large distance Heegaard splittings generic ?  [PDF]
Martin Lustig,Yoav Moriah
Mathematics , 2010,
Abstract: In a previous paper we introduced a notion of "genericity" for countable sets of curves in the curve complex of a surface S, based on the Lebesgue measure on the space of projective measured laminations in S. With this definition we prove that for each fixed g > 1 the set of irreducible genus g Heegaard splittings of high distance is generic, in the set of all irreducible Heegaard splittings. Our definition of "genericity" is different and more intrinsic then the one given via random walks.
Berge's distance 3 pairs of genus 2 Heegaard splittings  [PDF]
Martin Scharlemann
Mathematics , 2010, DOI: 10.1017/S0305004111000223
Abstract: Following an example discovered by John Berge, we show that there is a 4-component link L \subset (S^1 x S^2)#(S^1 x S^2) so that, generically, the result of Dehn surgery on L is a 3-manifold with two inequivalent genus 2 Heegaard splittings, and each of these Heegaard splittings is of Hempel distance 3.
Page 1 /100
Display every page Item

Copyright © 2008-2017 Open Access Library. All rights reserved.