Search Results: 1 - 10 of 100 matches for " "
All listed articles are free for downloading (OA Articles)
Page 1 /100
Display every page Item
Reply to arXiv:1211.3957 and arXiv:1211.4731 by Leader et al. and arXiv:1212.0761 by Harindranath et al
Ji, Xiangdong;Xiong, Xiaonu;Yuan, Feng
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology , 2013,
Abstract: We reply to the recent comments on our published papers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 152005 and Phys. Lett. B717 (2012) 214. We point out that the criticisms about the transverse polarization parton sum rule we obtained are invalid.
Reply to Comments on "Invariance of the tunneling method for dynamical black holes" arXiv:0907.2020  [PDF]
S. A. Hayward,R. Di Criscienzo,M. Nadalini,L. Vanzo,S. Zerbini
Physics , 2009,
Abstract: We point out basic misunderstandings about quantum field theory, general relativity and partial derivatives in the above Comments. In reply to a second comment on our first reply by the same author, we also identify precisely where the author's original calculation goes wrong and correct it, yielding the same local Hawking temperature as obtained by the Hamilton-Jacobi method.
Reply to arxiv:1106.3559 by J.I. Collar  [PDF]
The SIMPLE Collaboration
Physics , 2011,
Abstract: We reply to recent criticisms of the SIMPLE project by J.I. Collar [arxiv:1106.3559]
Ikeda and Miyazaki Reply to Rolf Schilling and Bernhard Schmid [arXiv:1101.5577]  [PDF]
Atsushi Ikeda,Kunimasa Miyazaki
Physics , 2011,
Abstract: Reply to the preceding comment by Rolf Schilling and Bernhard Schmid [arXiv:1101.5577, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 049601 (2011)].
Reply to the comment [arXiv:0903.5110] on "Mechanism of Terahertz Electromagnetic Emission from Intrinsic Josephson Junctions" [arXiv:0810.5268]  [PDF]
Masashi Tachiki,Tomio Koyama,Shouta Fukuya
Physics , 2009,
Abstract: We reply to the comment [arXiv:0903.5110] on our paper "Mechanism of Terahertz Electromagnetic Emission from Intrinsic Josephson Junctions" [arXiv:0810.5268].
Reply to Comment arXiv:0704.3529v1  [PDF]
R. de la Madrid
Physics , 2007,
Abstract: In this reply, we show that the author of the Comment arXiv:0704.3529v1 inadvertently provides additional arguments against the use of Hardy functions as test functions for the Gamow states.
How to check quantum mechanics independently (Reply to arXiv:1505.04293)  [PDF]
Yuri I. Ozhigov
Physics , 2015,
Abstract: This is the reply to the paper of Andrei Khrennikov arXiv:1505.04293 in which he expresses dissatisfaction with that the rough data in quantum experiments is not easily available and compares it with the open rough data in genetics. I try to explain why quantum experiments rough data is closed and why it differs radically from the biological. I also tried to answer the more thorny issue: is it possible to check quantum mechanics independently of other humans, e.g. trusting nobody.
Reply on ``Comment on neutrino-mixing interpretation of the GSI time anomaly''by C. Giunti, arXiv:0801.4639 [nucl-th]  [PDF]
A. N. Ivanov,R. Reda,P. Kienle
Physics , 2008,
Abstract: Here we reply critically to the comments by Giunti (arXiv:0801.4639 [nucl-th]) and justify our explanation of the experimentally observed periodic interference term in the rate of the K-shell electron capture decay of the H-like ions 140Pr58+ and 142Pm60+ as a neutrino-flavour mixing.
Response to arXiv:1005.2615  [PDF]
J. I. Collar,D. N. McKinsey
Physics , 2010,
Abstract: Brief response to a Reply [arXiv:1005.2615] on our Comments [arXiv:1005.0838] on XENON100 recent results [arXiv:1005.0380].
Reply to the revised Comment [PRL 102, 139601; arXiv:0810.4791] on ''Dynamic Scaling of Non-Euclidean Interfaces''  [PDF]
Carlos Escudero
Physics , 2008,
Abstract: This is the Reply to the revised Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139601; arXiv:0810.4791] by Joachim Krug on our paper: C. Escudero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116101 (2008); arXiv:0804.1898.
Page 1 /100
Display every page Item

Copyright © 2008-2017 Open Access Library. All rights reserved.