Search Results: 1 - 10 of 100 matches for " "
All listed articles are free for downloading (OA Articles)
Page 1 /100
Display every page Item
Reply to Wang's comment  [PDF]
You-Quan Li,Christian Gruber
Physics , 1998,
Abstract: The reply is no more necessary since the comment was already withdrawn
Reply to a Comment  [PDF]
Malte Henkel,Michel Pleimling
Physics , 2003, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.099602
Abstract: Reply to the Comment by F. Corberi, E. Lipiello and M. Zannetti (cond-mat/0211609).
Reply to A. Louis Comment  [PDF]
Arnaud Buhot
Physics , 2000, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1841
Abstract: Reply to A. Louis Comment: Fluid-solid phase-separation in hard-sphere mixtures is unrelated to bond-percolation
Reply to Johansen's comment  [PDF]
Laurent Laloux,Marc Potters,Jean-Pierre Aguilar,Jean-Philippe Bouchaud
Physics , 2002,
Abstract: This is a reply to Johansen's comment on `Are Financial Crashes Predictable?', by L. Laloux, M. Potters, R. Cont, J.P. Aguilar, J.P. Bouchaud, Europhys. Lett. 45, p. 1 (1999).
Remarks on reply to Johansen's comment  [PDF]
Anders Johansen
Physics , 2002,
Abstract: Remarks on reply (cond-mat/0206368) to Johansen's comment (cond-mat/0205249)
Comment on Reply of Benedetto et al  [PDF]
Dmitry V. Khmelev,William J. Teahan
Physics , 2003,
Abstract: We regret to point out several inaccurate and misleading statements that Benedetto {\em et al.} make in their Reply to our Comment on their paper titled ``Language Trees and Zipping''.
Reply to Yang et al.'s comment  [PDF]
Nguyen Ba An
Physics , 2006,
Abstract: This is to reply to a recent comment by Yang, Yuan and Zhang on ``Teleportation of two-quNit entanglement: Exploiting local resorces''.
Comment on "Taleyarkhan et al. Reply:"  [PDF]
B. Naranjo
Physics , 2007,
Abstract: In their Reply to my previous Comment, Taleyarkhan and coauthors measure their detectors' responses to a Cf-252 source, concluding that the resulting spectra differ substantially from the cavitation-fusion spectra published earlier in their Letter. On the contrary, I conclude that the two data sets are qualitatively consistent.
Reply to A. Patrascioiu's and E. Seiler's Comment on our paper "Percolation properties of the 2D Heisenberg model"  [PDF]
B. Alles,J. J. Alonso,C. Criado,M. Pepe
Physics , 2000, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5917
Abstract: Reply to comment appeared on hep-lat/9912014.
Reply to a comment of I. Schmelzer  [PDF]
Benjamin Schulz
Physics , 2009,
Abstract: This is a reply to the comment of Schmelzer on my earlier paper. In contrast to Schmelzer's claims, it is shown that passive locality does not correspond to the completeness condition of EPR. Nevertheless, it is argued that Schmelzer has found several errors in my article which, fortunately, can be corrected. In spite of Schmelzer's arguments, the Fritsche-Haugk theory can be used to define a local hidden variable theory for the singlet state.
Page 1 /100
Display every page Item

Copyright © 2008-2017 Open Access Library. All rights reserved.