The implementation of a robust community based participatory research (CBPR) study in Multnomah County, Oregon, has detailed broad and deep racial disparities across 27 institutions and systems. The process of this research has led to the identification of numerous practices that misrepresent and negate the experiences and very identity of communities of color. The research draws from engagement with numerous databases from the Census Bureau, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, and various administrative databases. The core issues at hand are population undercounts, understudy of the unique characteristics of these communities, inaccuracies in how data are codified and analyzed, and data collection efforts that are infused with white centrism and a colorblindness that renders issues minimized and the experiences of communities of color obscured. Collectively, we analyze this experience to suggest that much conventional policy research while wrapped in a cloak of objectivity is in fact a reproduction of whiteness that renders communities of color invisible, marginalized and misunderstood. The impact of these practices is to extend whiteness into the arena of policy research, and correspondingly extend dynamics of oppression and white centrism. The paper profiles each area of the policy research process that reflects and reinscribes whiteness and concludes with an articulation the reach of such conventional practice and outlines an avenue to reduce the influence of whiteness.
Bell, J., & Ridolfi, L. (2008). Adoration of the question: Reflections on the failure to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in the juvenile justice system. San Francisco, CA: W. Haywood Burns Institute.
Cahn, K., Miller, K., Bender, R., Cross-Hemmer, A., Feyerherm, B., & White, J. (2009). What we know about racial disproportionality and disparity in Oregon’s child welfare system: Decision point analysis quantitative report. Portland, OR: Portland State University.
Fraser, N. (2003). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition and participation. In N. Fraser, & A. Honneth (Eds.), Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange (pp. 7-109). New York: Verso.
McFadden K., & McShane L. (2010). Use of word Negro on 2010 census forms raises memories of Jim Crow. New York: New York Daily News.
Stehr-Green, P., Bettles, J., & Robertson, L. (2002). Effect of racial/ethnic misclassification of American Indians and Alaskan Natives on Washington State death certificates, 1989-1997. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 443-444. doi:10.2105/AJPH.92.3.443
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2009). Results from the 2008 national survey on drug use and health: National findings (Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-36, HHS Publication No. SMA 09-4434). Rockville, MD.
US Census Bureau (2004b). Meeting 21st century demographic data needs: Implementing the American Community Survey. Suitland, MD: US Department of Commerce.
US Department of Education (2007). Final guidance on maintaining, collecting and reporting racial and ethnic data to the US Department of Education. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
Wilson, E. (2005). Reinventing liberatory practice: How do we work with groups of which we are not a part? International Conference on Engaging Communities—Conference Papers, Queensland, Australia.
Young, I. (2000). Structure, difference and Hispanic/Latino claims of justice. In J. Gracia, & P. Greiff (Eds.) Hispanics/Latinos in the United States: Ethnicity, race and rights (pp. 147-165). New York: Routledge.