The present study first aimed to construct a coactivation model that integrates cognitive and motivational variables that determine an individual’s conscious humor experience. It then aimed to test the model’s reliability, validity, and generalizability. As part of the study, 16 (out of 48) four-frame cartoons were randomly presented to 201 (42 male and 159 female) high school students and 302 (185 male and 117 female) undergraduate and graduate students (age range was 15 to 23, M = 18.15, SD = 1.79) who were instructed to rate items related to the variable humor. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), the generalizability of the model to predict the humor experience to a great extent within different population samples was shown. Furthermore, the theoretical prediction of the coactivation model was supported. The results are discussed from the viewpoint of future research that could demonstrate the possible application of the coactivation model.
Goldstein, J. H., Harman, J., McGhee, P. E., & Karasik, R. (1975). Test of an information -processing model of humor: Physiological response changes during problem- and riddle-solving. Journal of General Psychology, 92, 59-68.
Hayashi, K., Hayashi, T., Iwanaga, S., Kawai, K., Ishii, H., Shoji, H., & Murakami, K. (2003). Laughter lowered the increase in postprandial blood glucose. Diabetes Care, 26, 1651-1652.
Herzog, T. R., Harris, A. C., Kropscott, L. S., & Fuller, K. L. (2006). Joke cruelty and joke appreciation revisited. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 19, 139-156.
Hilson, T. R., & Martin, R. A. (1994). What’s so funny about that?: The domains-interaction approach as a model of incongruity and resolution in humor. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 1-29.
Ito, H. (2007). The cognitive and emotional process through which one experiences humor: Toward an integration of two models in incongruity theories. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 14, 118-132.
Langevin, R., & Day, H. I. (1972). Physiological correlation of humor. In J. H. Goldstein and P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Nerhardt, G. (1970). Humor and inclination to laugh: Emotional reactions to stimuli of different divergence from a range of expectancy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11, 185-195.
Ruef, A. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2007). Continuous measurement of emotion. In J. A. Coan and Allen, J. J. B. (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc.
Suls, J. M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons. In J. H. Goldstein and P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Zillmann, D., Bryant, J., & Cantor, J. R. (1974). Brutality of assault in political cartoons affecting humor appreciation. Journal of Research in Personality, 7, 334-345. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(74)90055-5
Zwaan, R. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2006). Discourse comprehension. In M. A. Gernsbacher and M. J. Traxler (Eds.), Handbook of psychoinguis- cs (pp. 725-764). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.