Watershed is considered to be the ideal unit for management of the natural resources. Extraction of water-shed parameters using Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System (GIS) and use of mathematical models is the current trend for hydrologic evaluation of watersheds. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) having an interface with ArcView GIS software (AVSWAT2000/X) was selected for the estimation of runoff and sediment yield from an area of Suni to Kasol, an intermediate watershed of Satluj river, located in Western Himalayan region. The model was calibrated for the years 1993 & 1994 and validated with the observed runoff and sediment yield for the years 1995, 1996 and 1997. The performance of the model was evaluated using statistical and graphical methods to assess the capability of the model in simulating the run-off and sediment yield from the study area. The coefficient of determination (R2) for the daily and monthly runoff was obtained as 0.53 and 0.90 respectively for the calibration period and 0.33 and 0.62 respectively for the validation period. The R2 value in estimating the daily and monthly sediment yield during calibration was computed as 0.33 and 0.38 respectively. The R2 for daily and monthly sediment yield values for 1995 to 1997 was observed to be 0.26 and 0.47.
J. G. Arnold, R. S. Srinivasan, and J. R. Williams, “Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part 1. Model development,” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 34, No. 7389, 1998.
J. Benaman, C. A. Shoemaker, and D. A. Haith, “Model-ing non-point source pollution using a distributed water-shed model for the Cannonsville Reservoir Basin,” Dela-ware County, New York. Proceedings of the World Wa-ter & Environmental Resources Congress, May 20-24, 2001.
A. Francos, G. Bidoglio, L. Galbiati, F. Bouraoui, F. J. Elorza, S. Rekolainen, K. Manni, and K. Granlund, “Hy-drological and water quality modelling in medium sized coastal basin,” Physics Chemistry Earth (B), Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 47–52, 2001.
M. Jha, W. Philip Gassman, S. Secchi, R. Gu, and J. Ar-nold, “Effect of watershed subdivision on SWAT flow, sediment and nutrient predictions,” Journal of American Water Resources Association, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 811– 825, 2004.
S. L. Neitsch, J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry, J. R. Williams, and K. W. King, “Soil and water assessment tool thereo-tical documentation - version 2000,” Soil and Water Re-search Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, Grass-land, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas.
S. L. Neitsch, J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry, R. Srinivasan, and J. R. Williams, “Soil and water assessment tool user’s manual - version 2000,” Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, Grassland, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, Texas.
J. R. Peterson and J. M. Hamlett, “Hydrologic calibration of the SWAT model in a watershed containing fragipan soils,” Journal of the American Water Resources Asso-ciation, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 295–303, 1998.
C. A. Spruill, S. R. Workman, and J. L. Taraba, “Simula-tion of daily and monthly stream discharge from small watersheds using the SWAT model,” Transactions of ASAE, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 1431–1439, 2000.
M. P. Tripathi, R. K. Panda, and N. S. Raghuwanshi, “Identification and prioritisation of critical sub-water-sheds for soil conservation management using SWAT model,” Biosystems Engineering, Vol. 85, No. 3, pp. 365 –379, 2003.
E. Varanou, E. Gkouvatsou, E. Baltas, and M. Mimikou, “Quantity and quality integrated catchment modeling un-der climate change with use of soil and water assessment tool model” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 228–244, 2002.