The present study aimed to evaluate using the whole milk as alternative oral contrast for the as-sessment of gastrointestinal CT enterography. Fifty patients undergo (18 female and 32 male) aged from 21 to 79 years (mean 45 years) undergo abdominal CT at the department of diagnostic radiology of King Abdulaziz University Hospital. They receive 1 - 1.5 liter whole milk. Siemens SOMATOM definition CT Scan Machine with 64 slices and dual source was utilized to image all pa-tients in research population group where iodinated oral contrast media was replaced by a whole milk available in the local market. Patients were scanned as per the routine protocol used for CT Abdomen at KAUH-CT Unit: Helical Mode with 0.7 Pitch was performed on all paints in supine po-sition using a 16-detector row scanner (Bright Speed S, General Electric-Milwaukee Wisconsin, USA). The following parameters were applied: collimation of 16 × 0.625 (1.25 - 3.75) mm, pitch of 3, Slice thickness: 5 mm, gantry rotation time of 400 mAs, tube voltage of 120 KV and scan time 11.05 second. The images of all cases were reviewed by two qualified radiologists. Conclusion: The present study suggested that whole milk was found to be an effective alternative negative contrast for the assessment of the jejunum, ileum and terminal ileum in CT enterography. It was excellent for gastric imaging and we recommended replacing milk as negative oral contrast since it is available and cost effective. Further research to be conducted with modified milk drinking timing for better large bowel distention.
Dizendorf, E.V., Treyer, V., Von Schulthess, G.K. and Hany, T.F. (2002) Application of Oral Contrast Media in Coregistered Positron Emission Tomography-CT. American Journal of Roentgenology, 179, 477-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.179.2.1790477
Nyman, U., Dinnetz, G. and Anderson, I. (1984) E-Z-CAT: An Oral Contrast Medium for Use in Computed Tomography of the Abdomen. Acta Radiologica, 25, 121-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/028418518402500206
Nakada, K., Brown, R.S., Fisher, S.J., Higashi, T., Walter, G.L., Wahl, R.L., et al. (2001) Histological Localization of Tritiated FDG in the GI Tract: An Autoradiographic Study (abstr). Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 42, 25.
Makarawo, T.P., Negussie, E., Malde, S., Tilak, J., Gayagoy, J., Watson, J., Francis, F., Lincoln, D. and Jacobs, M.J. (2013) Water as a Contrast Medium: A Re-Evaluation Using the Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography. The American Surgeon, 79, 728-733.
Winter, T.C., Ager, J.D., Nghiem, H.V., Hill, R.S., Harrison, S.D. and Freeny, P.C. (1996) Upper Gastrointestinal Tract and Abdomen: Water as an Orally Administered Contrast Agent for Helical CT. Radiology, 201, 365-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.201.2.8888224
Raptopoulos, V., Davis, M.A. and Smith, E.H. (1986) Imaging of the Bowel Wall: Computed Tomography and Fat Density Oral-Contrast Agent in an Animal Model. Investigative Radiology, 21, 847-850. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004424-198611000-00003
Apisarnthanarak, P., Tiangpug, T., Pongpornsup, S., Janpanich, S. and Suwannasit, T. (2013) Comparison of Pasteurized Whole Milk, UHT Whole Milk, Water, and Diluted Iodine Contrast as Computed Tomographic Enteric Contrasts. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 96, 467-476.
Koo, C.W., Shah-Patel, L.R., Baer, J.W. and Frager, D.H. (2008) Cost-Effectiveness and Patient Tolerance of Low-Attenuation Oral Contrast Material: Milk versus Volumen. American Journal of Roentgenology, 190, 1307-1313. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3193
Lim, B.K., Bux, S.I., Rahmat, K., Lam, S.Y. and Liew, Y.W. (2012) Evaluation of Bowel Distension and Mural Visualisation Using Neutral Oral Contrast Agents for Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography. Singapore Medical Journal, 53, 732-736.