全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要


Communicating Climate Change through ICT-Based Visualization: Towards an Analytical Framework

DOI: 10.3390/su5114760

Keywords: climate change, visualization, communication, dome theatre

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The difficulties in communicating climate change science to the general public are often highlighted as one of the hurdles for support of enhanced climate action. The advances of interactive visualization using information and communication technology (ICT) are claimed to be a game-changer in our ability to communicate complex issues. However, new analytical frameworks are warranted to analyse the role of such technologies. This paper develops a novel framework for analyzing the content, form, context and relevance of ICT-based visualization of climate change, based on insights from literature on climate change communication. Thereafter, we exemplify the analytical framework by applying it to a pilot case of ICT-based climate visualization in a GeoDome. Possibilities to use affordable advanced ICT-based visualization devices in science and policy communication are rapidly expanding. We thus see wider implications and applications of the analytical framework not only for other ICT environments but also other issue areas in sustainability communication.

References

[1]  UNEP climate change strategy. Available online: http://www.unep.org/pdf/UNEP_CC_STRATEGY_web.pdf (accessed on 1 July 2013).
[2]  Moser, S. Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 2010, 1, 31–53, doi:10.1002/wcc.11.
[3]  Wolf, J.; Moser, S. Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: Insights from in-depth studies across the world. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 2011, 2, 547–569, doi:10.1002/wcc.120.
[4]  Nerlich, B.; Koteyko, N.; Brown, B. Theory and language of climate change communication. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 2010, 1, 97–110.
[5]  Wibeck, V. Enhancing learning, communication and public engagement about climate change—some lessons from recent literature. Environ. Educ. Res. 2013, doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.812720.
[6]  Nisbet, M.; Scheufele, D. What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. Am. J. Bot. 2009, 96, 1767–1778, doi:10.3732/ajb.0900041.
[7]  Sheppard, S.R.J.; Shaw, A.; Flanders, D.; Burch, S.; Wiek, A.; Carmichael, J.; Robinson, J.; Cohen, S. Future visioning of local climate change: A framework for community engagement and planning with scenarios and visualisation. Futures 2011, 43, 400–412, doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.01.009.
[8]  Few, R.; Brown, K.; Tompkins, E. Public participation and climate change adaptation: Avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Clim. Policy 2011, 7, 46–59.
[9]  Sheppard, S.R.J. Landscape visualisation and climate change. Environ. Sci. Policy 2005, 8, 637–654, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2005.08.002.
[10]  Sheppard, S.R.J. Visualizing Climate Change: A Guide to Visual Communication of Climate Change and Developing Local Solutions; Routledge: London, UK, 2012.
[11]  Wiek, A.; Iwaniec, D. Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science. Sustain. Sci. 2013, doi:10.1007/s11625-013-0208-6.
[12]  State of Climate Visualization. CSPR Report 2009:4; Neset, T., Johansson, J., Linnér, B.-O., Eds.; Link?ping University: Link?ping, Sweden, 2009.
[13]  Ware, C. Visual Thinking in Design; Morgan Kaufmann: Burlington, MA, USA, 2008.
[14]  Fiske, J. Introduction to Communication Studies, 3rd ed. ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2011.
[15]  Hulme, M. The conquering of climate: Discourses of fear and dissolution. Geogr.J. 2008, 174, 5–16, doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2008.00266.x.
[16]  Linnér, B.-O. Klimatpolitik och domedagsbasuner. In Apocalypse now—fakta, ideologi och domedags-scenarior i klimatf?r?ndringarnas k?lvatten. (in Swedish); Gustafsson-Lundberg, J., Liljefors Persson, B., Eds.; F?reningen l?rare i religionskunskap: Lomma, Sweden, 2008.
[17]  Moser, S.; Dilling, L. Making climate hot: Communicating the urgency and challenge of global climate change. Environment 2004, 46, 32–46, doi:10.1080/00139150409605820.
[18]  Moser, S. Talk of the city: Engaging urbanites on climate change. Environ. Res. Lett. 2006, 1, 1–10, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/1/1/014006.
[19]  Nicholson-Cole, S.A. Representing climate change futures: A critique on the use of images for visual communication. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2005, 29, 255–273, doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.05.002.
[20]  O’Neill, S.; Nicholson-Cole, S. “Fear won’t do it”: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci. Commun. 2009, 30, 355–379, doi:10.1177/1075547008329201.
[21]  Kahlor, L.; Rosenthal, S. If we seek, do we learn? Predicting knowledge on global warming. Sci. Commun. 2009, 30, 380–414, doi:10.1177/1075547008328798.
[22]  Harré, R.; Brockmeier, J.; Mühlh?user, P. Greenspeak: A Study of Environmental Discourse; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1999.
[23]  Davies, B.; Harré, R. Positioning: The discursive production of selves. J. Theory Soc. Behav. 1990, 20, 43–63, doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x.
[24]  Budescu, D.; Broomell, S.; Por, H. Improving communication of uncertainty in the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 20, 299–308, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02284.x.
[25]  Fortner, R.W.; Lee, J.-Y.; Corney, J.R.; Romanello, S.; Bonnell, J.; Luthy, B.; Figuerido, C.; Ntsiko, N. Public understanding of climate change: Certainty and willingness to act. Environ. Educ. Res. 2000, 6, 127–141, doi:10.1080/713664673.
[26]  Morton, T.A.; Rabinovich, A.; Marshall, D.; Bretschneider, P. The future that may (or may not) come: How framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communications. Glob. Environ. Change 2011, 21, 103–109, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.013.
[27]  Poortinga, W.; Spence, A.; Whitmarsh, L.; Capstick, S.; Pidgeon, N.F. Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 2011, 21, 1015–1024, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001.
[28]  Wibeck, V.; Linnér, B.-O. Public understanding of uncertainties in climate science and policy. In Global Change Management: Knowledge Gaps, Blindspots and Unknowables; Ibisch, P., Cybulla, F., Geiger, L., Eds.; Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft: Baden-Baden, Germany, 2012.
[29]  Linnér, B.-O. Learning for Survival. In Att l?ra f?r ?verlevnad: utbildningsprogrammen och milj?fr?gorna 1962–2002. (in Swedish); Stiftelsen Etermedia i Sverige, Arkiv f?rlag: Lund, Sweden, 2005.
[30]  Asplund, T. Metaphors in climate discourse: An analysis of Swedish farm magazines. J. Sci. Commun. 2011, 10. A01.
[31]  Koteyko, N.; Thelwall, M.; Nerlich, B. From carbon markets to carbon morality: Creative compounds as framing devices in online discourses on climate change mitigation. Sci. Commun. 2010, 32, 25–54, doi:10.1177/1075547009340421.
[32]  Lakoff, R.; Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live by; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1980.
[33]  Nerlich, B. Climategate’: Paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis. Environ. Values 2010, 19, 419–442, doi:10.3197/096327110X531543.
[34]  Nerlich, B.; Jaspal, R. Metaphors we die by? Geoengineering, metaphors, and the argument from catastrophe. Metaphor Symb. 2012, 27, 131–147, doi:10.1080/10926488.2012.665795.
[35]  Wibeck, V. Images of environmental management: Competing metaphors in focus group discussions of Swedish environmental quality objectives. Environ. Manag. 2012, 49, 776–787, doi:10.1007/s00267-012-9816-7.
[36]  Wibeck, V. Social representations of climate change in Swedish lay focus groups: Local or distant, gradual or catastrophic? Public Underst. Sci. 2012, doi:10.1177/0963662512462787.
[37]  Doyle, J. Picturing the clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the representational politics of climate change communication. Sci. Cult. 2007, 16, 129–150, doi:10.1080/09505430701368938.
[38]  MacEachren, A.M.; Kraak, M.-J. Research challenges in geovisualization. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2001, 28, 3–12, doi:10.1559/152304001782173970.
[39]  Maceachren, A.M.; Gahegan, M.; Pike, W.; Brewer, I.; Cai, G.; Lengerich, E.; Hardistry, F. Geovisualization for knowledge construction and decision support. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 2004, 24, 13–17.
[40]  Neset, T.-S.; Wibeck, V.; Uhrqvist, O.; Johansson, J. Visualizing Climate Change: The Potential of Dome Presentations as a Tool for Climate Communication. In Proceedings of the Eurographics 2010, Norrk?ping, Sweden, 3–7 May 2010; pp. 31–35.
[41]  Leiserowitz, A.; Maibach, E.; Roser-Renouf, C.; Hmielowski, J. Global Warming’s Six Americas, May 2011; Yale Project on Climate Change Communication: New Haven, CT, USA, 2011.
[42]  A framework for pro-environmental behaviours. Available online: http://www.defra.gov.uk/publications/files/pb13574-behaviours-report-080110.pdf (accessed on 1 July 2013).
[43]  Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA). Allm?nheten och klimatf?r?ndringen 2009. (in Swedish). Report 6311; SEPA: Stockholm, Sweden.
[44]  Maibach, E.W.; Leiserowitz, A.; Roser-Renouf, C.; Mertz, C.K. Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PLoS One 2011, 6, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017571.
[45]  Akerlof, K.; Bruff, G.; Witte, J. Audience segmentation as a tool for communicating climate change. Park Sci. 2011, 28, 55–64.
[46]  Neresini, F.; Pellegrini, G. Evaluating Public Communication of Science and Technology. In Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2008.
[47]  Norrk?ping Visualization Centre. Available online: http://www.visualiseringscenter.se (accessed on 1 July 2013).
[48]  The Elumenati. Available online: http://www.elumenati.com/products/geodome (accessed on 1 July 2013).
[49]  Norrk?ping Visualization Centre. Available online: http://www2.visualiseringscenter.se/technology/en/index.php (accessed on 1 July 2013).
[50]  Moscovici, S. The Phenomenon of Social Representations. In Social Representations; Farr, R., Moscovici, S., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1984.
[51]  H?ijer, B. Emotional anchoring and objectification in the media reporting on climate change. Public Underst. Sci. 2010, 19, 717–731, doi:10.1177/0963662509348863.
[52]  Olausson, U. “We’re the ones to blame”: Citizens’ representations of climate change and the role of the media. Environ. Commun. 2011, 5, 281–299.
[53]  SCISS. Available online: http://www.sciss.se (accessed on 1 July 2013).
[54]  Manzo, K. Beyond polar bears? Re-envisioning climate change. Meterol. Appl. 2010, 17, 196–208, doi:10.1002/met.193.
[55]  Europeans’ attitudes towards climate change. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_300_full_en.pdf (accessed on 1 July 2013).
[56]  Mindmap Analyzer. Available online: http://www.mindmap-analyzer.se (accessed on 1 July 2013).
[57]  Lourdel, N.; Gondran, N.; Laforest, V.; Debray, B.; Brodhag, C. Sustainable development cognitive map: A new method of evaluating student understanding. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2007, 2, 170–182.
[58]  Marková, I.; Grossen, M.; Linell, P. Dialogue in Focus Groups: Exploring Socially Shared Knowledge; Equinox: London, UK, 2007.
[59]  Wibeck, V.; ?berg, G.; Abrandt-Dahlgren, M. Learning in focus groups: An analytical dimension for enhancing focus group research. Qual. Res. 2007, 7, 249–262, doi:10.1177/1468794107076023.
[60]  Jovchelovitch, S. Contextualising Focus Groups: Understanding Groups and Cultures. In Proceedings of the V Meeting of “Conversation et Language”, Paris, France; 2001.
[61]  Wilkinson, S. Focus group methodology: A review. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 1998, 1, 181–203.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus