全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

PLOS ONE  2013 

Assessing the Primary Data Hosted by the Spanish Node of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF)

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055144

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In order to effectively understand and cope with the current ‘biodiversity crisis’, having large-enough sets of qualified data is necessary. Information facilitators such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) are ensuring increasing availability of primary biodiversity records by linking data collections spread over several institutions that have agreed to publish their data in a common access schema. We have assessed the primary records that one such publisher, the Spanish node of GBIF (GBIF.ES), hosts on behalf of a number of institutions, considered to be a highly representative sample of the total mass of available data for a country in order to know the quantity and quality of the information made available. Our results may provide an indication of the overall fitness-for-use in these data. We have found a number of patterns in the availability and accrual of data that seem to arise naturally from the digitization processes. Knowing these patterns and features may help deciding when and how these data can be used. Broadly, the error level seems low. The available data may be of capital importance for the development of biodiversity research, both locally and globally. However, wide swaths of records lack data elements such as georeferencing or taxonomical levels. Although the remaining information is ample and fit for many uses, improving the completeness of the records would likely increase the usability span for these data.

References

[1]  Heywood VH, Watson RT (1995) Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1152 p.
[2]  Pimm SL, Russell GJ, Gittleman JL, Brooks TM (1995) The future of biodiversity. Science 269: 347–350.
[3]  Wilson EO (1988) The current state of Biological diversity. In: Wilson EO, editor. Biodiversity. Washington DC: National Academy Press. 3–18.
[4]  Jenkins M (2003) Prospects for biodiversity. Science 302: 1175–1177.
[5]  Loreau M, Oteng-Yeboah A, Arroyo MTK, Babin D, Barbault R, et al. (2006) Diversity without representation. Nature 442: 245–246.
[6]  Maclean IMD, Wilson RJ (2011) Recent ecological responses to climate change support predictions of high extinction risk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 12337–12342.
[7]  Krishtalka L, Humphrey PS (2000) Can natural history museums capture the future? BioScience 50: 611–617.
[8]  Valdecasas AG, Camacho AI (2003) Conservation to the rescue of taxonomy. Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 1113–1117.
[9]  Canhos VP, Souza S, Canhos DAL (2004) Global biodiversity informatics: Setting the scene for a “new world” of ecological modeling. Biodiversity Informatics 1: 1–13.
[10]  Mace GM (2005) An index of intactness. Nature 434 (March): 32–33.
[11]  Ferrier S, Guisan A (2006) Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level. Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 393–404.
[12]  Ingwersen P, Chavan V (2011) Indicators for the Data Usage Index (DUI): An incentive for publishing primary biodiversity data through global information infrastructure. BMC Bioinformatics (Suppl 15): S3.
[13]  Dawson TP, Jackson ST, House JI, Prentice IC, Mace GM (2011) Beyond predictions: Biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Science 332: 53–58.
[14]  Sarkar IN (2007) Biodiversity Informatics: organizing and linking information across the spectrum of life. Briefings in Bioinformatics 8 (5): 347–357.
[15]  Lira-Noriega A, Soberón J, Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Nakazawa Y, Peterson AT (2007) Scale dependency of diversity components estimated from primary biodiversity data and distribution maps. Diversity and Distributions 13: 185–195.
[16]  Johnson NF (2007) Biodiversity informatics. Annual review of entomology 52: 421–438.
[17]  Guralnick RP, Hill AW (2009) Biodiversity informatics: Automated approaches for documenting global biodiversity patterns and processes. Bioinformatics 25: 421–428.
[18]  Schipper J, Chanson JS, Chiozza F, Cox NA, Hoffmann M, et al. (2008) The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: Diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science 322: 225–230.
[19]  Kent R, Bar-Massada A, Carmel Y (2011) Multiscale analyses of mammal species composition: Environment relationship in the contiguous USA. PLoS ONE 6: e25440.
[20]  Bisby FA (2000) The quiet revolution: Biodiversity informatics and the Internet. Science 289: 2309–2312.
[21]  Guralnick RP, Hill AW, Lane M (2007) Towards a collaborative, global infrastructure for biodiversity assessment. Ecology letters 10: 663–672.
[22]  Yesson C, Brewer PW, Sutton T, Caithness N, Pahwa JS, et al. (2007) How global is the Global Biodiversity Information Facility? PLoS ONE 2: e1124.
[23]  Boakes EH, McGowan PJK, Fuller RA, Chang-qing D, Clark NE, et al. (2010) Distorted views of biodiversity: Spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data. PLoS Biology 8: e10000385.
[24]  Global Biodiversity Information Facility (2006a) Memorandum of Understanding. Available: http://www.gbif.org/fileadmin/Temp_for_N?ew_Web_Site/mou01-06.pdf. Accessed 2012 Mar 12.
[25]  Global Biodiversity Information Facility (2006b) Terms of Reference for the Participant Node Managers Committee (NODES). Available: http://imsgbif.gbif.org/CMS_NEW/get_file?.php?FILE=693d470600b66366f205df00bb478c. Accessed 2012 Mar 12.
[26]  Telenius A (2011) Biodiversity information goes public: GBIF at your service. Nordic Journal of Botany 29: 378–381.
[27]  Darwin Core Task Group (2009) Darwin Core. Available: http://www.tdwg.org/standards/450/. Accessed 2012 Sep 19.
[28]  Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Publishing software. Available: http://www.gbif.org/informatics/standard?s-and-tools/publishing-data/publishing-s?oftware/. Accessed 2012 Sep 19.
[29]  Chapman AD (2004) Environmental Data Quality - a. Discussion paper. Available: http://splink.cria.org.br/docs/appendix_?h.pdf. Accessed 2012 Mar 12.
[30]  Chavan V, Penev L (2011) The data paper: a mechanism to incentivize data publishing in biodiversity science. BMC Bioinformatics, (Suppl 15): S2.
[31]  Pando F, Sánchez-Moreno B, Ari?o AH (2011) An evolutionary history of the Spanish GBIF Node. GBIF at 10: Reaping benefits for science and society. 2011 GBIF Science Symposium, Argentina. Available: http://imsgbif.gbif.org/CMS_NEW/get_file?.php?FILE=47063a3189026102f29151040d7f12. Accessed 2012 Mar 12.
[32]  Ari?o AH, Galicia D (2005) Taxonomic-grade images. In: H?user CL, Steiner A, Holstein J, Scoble MJ, editors. Digital Imaging of Biological Type Specimens. A Manual of Best Practice. Stuttgart: ENBI. 87–125.
[33]  Hill AW, Otegui J, Ari?o AH, Guralnick RP (2011) GBIF Position Paper on Future Directions and Recommendations for Enhancing Fitness-for-Use across the GBIF Network. GBIF, Copenhagen. Available: http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=2777. Accessed 2012 Mar 12.
[34]  Ari?o AH, Otegui J (2009) Meta-análisis de los datos de biodiversidad suministrados a través de gbif.es. Universidad de Navarra; Available: http://www.gbif.es/ficheros/CSeg/MetaGBI?FEs.pdf. Accessed 2012 Mar 12.
[35]  Encinas MA, Pando F (2010) Análisis comparativo de los datos de biodiversidad en Espa?a y su publicación en GBIF. GBIF Espa?a, Unidad de Coordinación. Available: http://www.gbif.es/ficheros/MetaGBIFEs.p?df. Accessed 2012 Mar 12.
[36]  Ari?o AH (2006) Variable-level nomenclators. Proceedings of TDWG 2006: 84.
[37]  Ari?o AH, Otegui J (2008) Sampling biodiversity sampling. Proceedings of TDWG 2008: 77–78.
[38]  Otegui J, Ari?o AH (2009) Have standards enhanced biodiversity data? Global correction and acquisition patterns. Proceedings of TDWG 2009: 31–32.
[39]  Otegui J, Robles E, Ari?o AH (2009) Noise in biodiversity data. Poster presented at the “e-biosphere” Conference on Biodiversity Informatics, London, 2009.
[40]  Bisby FA, Roskov YR, Orrell TM, Nicolson D, Paglinawan LE et al.. (2011) Species 2000 and ITIS Catalogue of Life: 2011 Annual Checklist. Available: http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-ch?ecklist/2011/. Accessed 2012 Mar 12.
[41]  Otegui J, Ari?o AH, Chavan V, Gaiji S. On the dates of the GBIF mobilised primary biodiversity data records. Biodiversity Informatics. In press.
[42]  Berendsohn WG, Chavan V, Macklin JA (2010) Recommendations of the GBIF Task Group on the Global Strategy and Action Plan for the mobilization of natural history collections data. Biodiversity Informatics 7: 67–71.
[43]  Palmer CL, Cragin MH, Heidorn PB, Smith LC (2007) Data curation for the long tail of science: The case of environmental sciences. Paper presented at the Third International Digital Curation Conference; 11–13 December 2007, Washington DC, USA.
[44]  Ari?o AH (2010) Approaches to estimating the universe of natural history collections data. Biodiversity Informatics 7: 81–92.
[45]  Wieczorek J, Guo Q, Hijmans R (2004) The point-radius method for georeferencing locality descriptions and calculating associated uncertainty. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 18: 745–767.
[46]  Chapman AD, Wieczorek J (2006) Guide to Best Practices for Georeferencing. Copenhagen: Global Biodiversity Information Facility.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus