All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99

ViewsDownloads

Relative Articles

Procedure Standard and Administrative Investigation<br/>—Realization of the Self-Discipline Principle

On the Principle of Administrative Openness in the Administrative Procedure Law
论行政程序法上的行政公开原则

THE PROCEDURE OF REALIZATION OF THE DIDACTIC PRINCIPLE OF VISUAL METHOD IN AN EDUCATIONAL LABORATORY МЕТОДИКА РЕАЛ ЗАЦ ДИДАКТИЧНОГО ПРИНЦИПУ НАОЧНОСТ У НАВЧАЛЬН Й ЛАБОРАТОР

The Principle of Proportionality and Its Implementation in Lithuanian Administrative Law

GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. THE ROMANIAN PERSPECTIV

The study plan forming algorithm based on the study discipline formalized presentation procedure

Applying the Legal Security Principle in Administrative Law

On the Avoidance System in the Administrative Procedure
论行政回避制度

ORGANIZATION OF SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATIVE STRATEGIC CONTROL OF EXPENSES FOR PRODUCTION AND REALIZATION OF PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISE/ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯ СИСТЕМЫ УПРАВЛЕНЧЕСКОГО СТРАТЕГИЧЕСКОГО КОНТРОЛЯ ЗАТРАТ НА ПРОИЗВОДСТВО И РЕАЛИЗАЦИЮ ПРОДУКЦИИ ПРОМЫШЛЕННОГО ПРЕДПРИЯТИЯ

Administrative Procedure Laws of the People’s Republic of China and Colombia

STRATEGY OF ADMINISTRATIVE COMPETENCE FORMING AND METHODICAL TERMS OF ITS REALIZATION СТРАТЕГ Я ФОРМУВАННЯ УПРАВЛ НСЬКИХ КОМПЕТЕНЦ Й ТА МЕТОДИЧН УМОВИ РЕАЛ ЗАЦ

More...

Procedure Standard and Administrative Investigation
—Realization of the Self-Discipline Principle

DOI: 10.4236/ojps.2013.34016, PP. 113-115

Keywords: Administrative Investigation, Concrete Administrative Act, Discretionary Act, Self-discipline Principle

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

How to effectively protect the interests and rights of individuals and how to even realize a higher-level goal, individual justice and creative property are disturbing problems in administrative investigation. However, the complexity of the problem is increased because it includes arbitrary investigation and compulsory investigation. The specialness of the problem can be discovered through the clarity of administrative investigations on the attribution of concrete administrative acts. There is another effective method, namely the procedure standard reflecting the self-discipline principle except the mainstream method of right-control (i.e. judicial review). It is a combination of self-discipline with right-control, and may be one of the methods keeping pace with judicial review to realize the above-mentioned goal.

References

[1]  Fang, S. (1996). Discussion on the specific administrative acts (p. 144). Wuhan: Wuhan University Press.
[2]  Hartmut, M. (2000). General expositions of administrative law (p. 466). Beijing: Law Press China.
[3]  Karlllewellyn (1960). The common law tradition: Findings of fact and applicable discretionary factors of law in the judicial process.
[4]  Richard, B. S. (2002). The reconstruction of the administrative law of the United States (p. 2). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
[5]  Shiono, H. (1999a). Administrative Law (pp. 63-67). Beijing: Law Press China.
[6]  Shiono, H. (1999b). Administrative Law I (2nd ed.), Yuhikaku.
[7]  Liu, W. J. (2004). Discussion on administrative forced inspection. Journal of National Prosecutors College, 1, 16-25.
[8]  Wang, X. X. (2002). Free discretion and administrative justice— Reading the discretionary justice of Davis. Peking University Law Journal, 1, 11-22.
[9]  Yang, H. (2000). Discussion on administrative investigation. Administrative Law Review, 2, 6-9.
[10]  Ye, B. F. (2005). Classification of administrative action: Notion reconstruction or thoroughly overhauling. Tribune of Political Science and Law, 2, 170-172.
[11]  Zhou, Y. Y. (2006). Administrative investigation of action process— Investigation in a new research paradigm. Studies in Law and Business, 1, 129-136.
[12]  Zhu, M. (2006). Discretionary standards system of “Japanese Administrative Procedure Law”—As the internal composition of procedural legitimacy security device. Journal of the East China University of Politics & Law, 1, 73-79.
[13]  Zhang, J. S. (2001). Discussion on the principle of administrative openness. Studies in Law and Business, 5, 62-65.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus