The horizontal distribution of stems, stand density and the differentiation of tree dimensions are among the most important aspects of stand structure. An increasing complexity of stand structure is often linked to a higher number of species and to greater ecological stability. For quantification, the Structural Complexity Index (SCI) describes structural complexity by means of an area ratio of the surface that is generated by connecting the tree tops of neighbouring trees to form triangles to the surface that is covered by all triangles if projected on a flat plane. Here, we propose two ecologically relevant modifications of the SCI: The degree of mingling of tree attributes, quantified by a vector ruggedness measure, and a stem density term. We investigate how these two modifications influence index values. Data come from forest inventory field plots sampled along a disturbance gradient from heavily disturbed shrub land, through secondary regrowth to mature montane rainforest stands in Mengsong, Xishuangbanna,Yunnan,China. An application is described linking structural complexity, as described by the SCI and its modified versions, to changes in species composition of insect communities. The results of this study show that the Enhanced Structural Complexity Index (ESCI) can serve as a valuable tool for forest managers and ecologists for describing the structural complexity of forest stands and is particularly valuable for natural forests with a high degree of structural
Doherty, M., Kearns, A., Barnett, G., Sarre, A., Hochuli, D., Gibb, H., & Dickman, C. (2000). The interaction between habitat conditions, ecosystem processes and terrestrial biodiversity: A review. State of the Environment, Second Technical Paper Series (Biodiversity), Environment Australia, Department of Environment and Heritage.
Franklin, J., Spies, T., Pelt, R., Carey, A., Thornburgh, D., Berg, D. et al. (2002). Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. Forest Ecology and Management, 155, 399-423.
Freemark, K., & Merriam, H. (1986). Importance of area and habitat heterogeneity to bird assemblages in temperate forest fragments. Biological Conservation, 36, 115-141.
Grasman, R., Gramacy, R.B., & Sterratt, D. C. (2011). Geometry: Mesh generation and surface tesselation. R Package Version 0.2-0. URL (last checked 5 June 2012).
LeMay, V., & Staudhammer, C. (2005). Indices of stand structural diversity: Mixing discrete, continuous, and spatial variables. In Proceedings of the IUFRO Sustainable Forestry in Theory and Practice: Recent Advances in Inventory & Monitoring, Statistics, Information & Knowledge Management, and Policy Science Conference (p. 4). Edinburgh, 5-8 April 2005.
McElhinny, C., Gibbons, P., Brack, C., & Bauhus, J. (2005). Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: Its de?nition and measure- ment. Forest Ecology and Management, 218, 1-24.
Oksanen, J., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., O’Hara, B., Stevens, M., Oksanen, M., & Suggests, M. (2007). The vegan package. Community ecology package. URL (last checked 5 June 2012).
Polley, H. (2007). Survey instructions for federal forest inventory II (2001-2002), 2nd corrected translation, February 2006, of the 2nd corrected and revised reprint, May 2001. Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection, Bundesministerium für Verbraucherschutz, Ernahrung und Landwirtschaft (BMVEL). URL (last checked 10 September 2012).
Pretzsch, H. (1997). Analysis and modeling of spatial stand structures. Methodological considerations based on mixed beech-larch stands in Lower Saxony. Forest Ecology and Management, 97, 237-253.
Recher, H., Majer, J., & Ganesh, S. (1996). Eucalypts, arthropods and birds: On the relation between foliar nutrients and species richness. Forest Ecology and Management, 85, 177-195.
Sappington, J., Longshore, K., & Thompson, D. (2007). Quantifying landscape ruggedness for animal habitat analysis: A case study using bighorn sheep in the Mojave Desert. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 71, 1419-1426. doi:10.2193/2005-723
Spanos, K., & Feest, A. (2007). A review of the assessment of biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 18, 475-486.
Temple, S., Mossman, M., & Ambuel, B. (1979). The ecology and management of avian communities in mixed hardwood-coniferous forests. In Management of north-central and northeastern forests for nongame birds (pp. 132-153). USDA.
Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V., Tielb?rger, K., Wichmann, M., Schwager, M., & Jeltsch, F. (2004). Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: The importance of keystone structures. Journal of Biogeography, 31, 79-92.
United States Department of Agriculture—Forest Service (2011). Forest inventory and analysis, national core field guide, volume I: Field data collection procedures for phase 2 plots, version 5.1. URL (last checked 10 October 2012).
Yu, D., Ji, Y., Emerson, B., Wang, X., Ye, C., Yang, C., & Ding, Z. (2012). Biodiversity soup: Metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 613-623. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00198.x
Zenner, E. K., L?hde, E., & Laiho, O. (2011). Contrasting the temporal dynamics of stand structure in even- and uneven-sized Picea abies dominated stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 41, 289-299. doi:10.1139/X10-205.