In this work we propose a centrality measure for networks, which we refer to as Laplacian centrality, that provides a general framework for the centrality of a vertex based on the idea that the importance (or centrality) of a vertex is related to the ability of the network to respond to the deactivation or removal of that vertex from the network. In particular, the Laplacian centrality of a vertex is defined as the relative drop of Laplacian energy caused by the deactivation of this vertex. The Laplacian energy of network Gwith nvertices is defined as , where is the eigenvalue of the Laplacian matrix of G. Other dynamics based measures such as that of Masuda and Kori and PageRank compute the importance of a node by analyzing the way paths pass through a node while our measure captures this information as well as the way these paths are “redistributed” when the node is deleted. The validity and robustness of this new measure are illustrated on two different terrorist social network data sets and 84 networks in James Moody’s Add Health in school friendship nomination data, and is compared with other standard centrality measures.
Z. Maoz, D. Kuperman, L. Terris and I. Talmud, “Structural Equivalence and International Conflict: A Social Networks Analysis,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 50, No. 5, 2006, pp. 664-689.
T. Opsahl, F. Agneessens and J. Skvoretz, “Node Centrality in Weighted Networks: Generalizing Degree and Shortest Paths,” Social Networks, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2010, pp. 245-251. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006
S. Koschade, “A Social Network Analysis of Jemaah Islamiyah: The Applications to Counterterrorism and Intelligence,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2006, pp. 559-575.
S. Pemmaraju and S. Skiena, “All-Pairs Shortest Paths and Transitive Closure and Reduction. In: Computational Discrete Mathematics: Combinatorics and Graph Theory in Mathematica. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press, 2003. pp. 330-331 and 353-356.