In this paper we provide a critical overview of the state of the art in human-centric intelligent data management approaches for geographic visualizations when we are faced with bandwidth limitations. These limitations often force us to rethink how we design displays for geographic visualizations. We need ways to reduce the amount of data to be visualized and transmitted. This is partly because modern instruments effortlessly produce large volumes of data and Web 2.0 further allows bottom-up creation of rich and diverse content. Therefore, the amount of information we have today for creating useful and usable cartographic products is higher than ever before. However, how much of it can we really use online? To answer this question, we first calculate the bandwidth needs for geographic data sets in terms of waiting times. The calculations are based on various data volumes estimated by scholars for different scenarios. Documenting the waiting times clearly demonstrates the magnitude of the problem. Following this, we summarize the current hardware and software solutions, then the current human-centric design approaches trying to address the constraints such as various screen sizes and information overload. We also discuss a limited set of social issues touching upon the digital divide and its implications. We hope that our systematic documentation and critical review will help researchers and practitioners in the field to better understand the current state of the art.
References
[1]
Zhao, H. Globalizing trend of China's mobile internet. 2011. (accessed on 5 December 2011). Available online: http://www.itu.int.
[2]
Gahran, A. FCC warns of looming mobile spectrum crunch. CNN Tech.. (accessed on 5 December 2011), 2010. Available online: http://articles.cnn.com.
[3]
Ramsay, J.; Barbesi, A.; Preece, I. A Psychological investigation of long retrieval times on the world wide web. Interact. Comput. 1998, 10, 77–86.
[4]
Lazar, J.; Norcio, A. To err or not to err. that is the question: Novice user perception of errors while surfing the web. Proceedings of the Information Resource Management Association 1999, International Conference, Hershey, PA, USA, May 16–19; 1999; pp. 321–325.
[5]
Jacko, J.; Sears, A.; Borella, M. The effect of network delay and media on user perceptions of web resources. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2000, 19, 427–439.
[6]
Nielsen, J. The need for speed. 1997. Available online: http://www.useit.com (accessed on 5 December 2011).
[7]
Selvidge, P.R.; Chaparro, B.S.; Bender, G.T. The world wide wait: Effects of delays on user performance. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2002, 29, 15–20.
[8]
Nielsen, J. 2010 Website response times. 2010. Available online: http://www.useit.com (accessed on 5 December 2011).
[9]
？ztürk, ？.; R？zvano？lu, K. How to improve user experience in mobile social networking: A user-centered study with turkish mobile social network site users. In Design, User Experience, and Usability; Marcus, P.I., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. LNCS 6769; pp. 521–530.
[10]
Gore, A. The digital earth: Understanding our planet in the 21st century. California Science Center: Los Angeles, CA, 1998. Available online: http://www.isde5.org/al_gore_speech.htm (accessed on 5 December 2011).
[11]
Coltekin, A.; Clarke, K.C. A representation of everything. Geospat. Today 2011, 01, 26–28.
[12]
Longley, P.A.; Goodchild, M.F.; Maguire, D.J.; Rhind, D.W. Geographic Information Systems and Science; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2005.
[13]
Wikimedia. Reliefkarte Schweiz. 2011. Available online: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Reliefkarte_Schweiz.png (accessed on 5 December 2011).
[14]
OSM. 2011. Available online: http://www.openstreetmap.org (accessed on 5 December 2011).
[15]
Imielinski, T.; Badrinath, B.R. Mobile wireless computing: Challenges in data management. Commun. ACM 1994, 37, 18–28.
[16]
Smith, T.R. A digital library for geographically referenced materials. Computer 1996, 29, 54–60.
[17]
Barrie, J.M.; Presti, D.E. The WWW as an instructional tool. Science 1996, 274, 371–372.
[18]
Google Earth. 2011. Available online: http://earth.google.com (accessed on 5 December 2011).
[19]
Bertolotto, M.; Egenhofer, M.J. Progressive transmission of vector map data over the world wide web. GeoInformatica 2001, 5, 345–373.
[20]
Burigat, S.; Chittaro, L. Visualizing the results of interactive queries for geographic data on mobile devices. Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international workshop on Geographic information systems (GIS '05), New York, NY, USA, November 2005; pp. 277–284.
[21]
Burigat, S.; Chittaro, L. Interactive visual analysis of geographic data on mobile devices based on dynamic queries. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 2008, 19, 99–122.
[22]
Shannon, C.E. Communication in the Presence of Noise. Proc. of Inst. Radio Eng. 1949, 37, 10–21.
[23]
Hartley, V.L. Transmission of information. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1928, 7, 535–563.
[24]
Kessels, J.C. Download time calculator. Available online: http://www.numion.com/calculators/time.html (accessed on 5 December 2011).
[25]
TM Technologies. Perceived performance—tuning a system for what really matters. Available online: http://www.tmurgent.com/WhitePapers/PerceivedPerformance.pdf (accessed on 5 December 2011).
[26]
Millar, R.B. Response in man-machine conversational transactions. Proceedings of AFIPS Fall Joint Computer Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, December 1968; pp. 267–277.
[27]
Zona Research. The Economic Impacts of Unacceptable Web-Site Download Speeds; Zona Research: Redwood City, CA, USA, 1999.
[28]
Nielsen, J. Response times: The 3 Important Limits; Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1993.
[29]
Schroder, H.M.; Driver, M.J.; Streufert, S. Human Information Processing—Individuals and Groups Functioning in Complex Social Situations; Holt, Rinehart, & Winston: New York, NY, USA, 1967.
[30]
Eppler, M.J.; Mengis, J. Side-effects of the e-society: The causes of information overload and possible countermeasures. Proceedings of IADIS International Conference e-Society, Avila, Spain, 16–19 July 2004; pp. 1119–1124.
[31]
Miller, A.G. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 1956, 63, 81–97.
[32]
Baddeley, A.D.; Hitch, G. Working Memory. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory; Bower, G.H., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1974; Volume 8, pp. 47–89.
[33]
Ware, C. Information Visualization—Perception for Design, 2nd ed. ed.; Elsevier Inc., Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2004.
[34]
Duchowski, A.T.; Coltekin, A. Foveated gaze-contingent displays for peripheral LOD management, 3D visualization and stereo imaging. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. (TOMCCAP) 2007, 3, 1–18.
[35]
Gobron, S.; Coltekin, A.; Bonafos, H.; Thalmann, D. GPGPU computation and visualization of three-dimensional cellular automata. Vis. Comput. 2010, 27, 67–81.
[36]
Ali, A.; Khelil, A.; Szczytowski, P.; Neeraj, S. An adaptive and compsite spatio-temporal data compression approach for wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of ACM MSWiM'11, Miami, FL, USA, 31 October–4 November 2011.
[37]
Kattan, A. Universal intelligent data compression systems: A review. Proceedings of 2010 2nd Computer Science and Electronic Engineering Conference, Essex, UK, 8–9 September 2010; pp. 1–10.
[38]
Pereira, F. Video compression: Discussing the next steps. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE international conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME'09), New York, NY, USA, June 28–July 3, 2009; IEEE Press: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 1582–1583.
[39]
Peyre, G. A review of adaptive image representations. IEEE J. Selected Top. Signal Process. 2011, 99, 896–911.
[40]
Hou, P.; Hojjatoleslami, A.; Petrou, M.; Underwood, C.; Kittler, J. Improved JPEG coding for remote sensing. Proceedings of Fourteenth International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 16–20 August 1998; 2, pp. 1637–1639.
Heok, T.K.; Daman, D. A review on level of detail. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualization, (CGIV 2004), Penang, Malaysia, 26–29 July 2004; pp. 70–75.
[43]
Constantinescu, Z. Levels of detail: An overview. J. LANA 2000, 5, 39–52.
[44]
Coltekin, A. Foveation for 3D visualization and stereo imaging. Ph.D. Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland, February 2006.
[45]
Perry, J.; Geisler, W.S. Gaze-contingent real-time simulation of arbitrary visual fields. Proc. SPIE 2002, 4662, 57–69.
[46]
Sanghoon, L.; Bovik, A.C.; Kim, Y.Y. High quality low delay foveated visual communication over mobile channels. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 2005, 16, 180–211.
[47]
Reddy, M. Perceptually modulated level of detail for virtual environments. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, July 1997.
[48]
Luebke, D.; Reddy, M.; Cohen, J.D.; Varshney, A.; Watson, B.; Huebner, R. Level of Detail for 3D Graphics.; Elsevier Science Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2002.
[49]
CityGML. 2011. Available online: http://www.citygml.org (accessed on 5 December 2011).
[50]
Koller, D.; Lindstrom, P.; Ribarsky, W.; Hodges, L.F.; Faust, N.; Turner, G. Virtual GIS: A real-time 3D geographic information system. Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Visualization '95 (VIS '95), Atlanta, GA, USA, 29 October–3 November 1995; pp. 94–100.
[51]
Dadi, U.; Cheng, L.; Vatsavai, R.R. Query and visualization of extremely large network datasets over the Web using quadtree based KML regional network links. Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Geoinformatics, Fairfax, VA, 12–14 August 2009; pp. 1–4.
[52]
Kolbe, T.H.; Gr？ger, G.; Plümer, L. CityGML – Interoperable access to 3D city models. Proceedings of the Int. Symposium on Geo-information for Disaster Management, 21–23 March 2005; Oosterom, P., Zlatanova, S., Fendel, E.M., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 883–900.
[53]
Benner, J.; Geiger, A.; H？fele, K.-H. Concept for building licensing based on standardized 3D geo information. Proceedings of the 5th International 3D GeoInfo Conference, Berlin, Germany, 3–4 November 2010.
[54]
Bektas, K.; Coltekin, A. An approach to modeling spatial perception for geovisualization. Proceedings of STGIS 2011, Tokyo, Japan, 14–16 September 2011.
[55]
Reichenbacher, T. Adaption in mobile and ubiquitous cartography. In Multimedia Cartography, 2nd ed.; Cartwight, W., Peterson, M., Gartner, G., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 383–397.
[56]
Reichenbacher, T. The concept of relevance in mobile maps. In Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography; Gartner, G., Cartwight, W., Peterson, M., Eds.; Location Based Services and TeleCartography, Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 231–246.
[57]
Swienty, O.; Reichenbacher, T.; Reppermund, S.; Zihl, J. The role of relevance and cognition in attention-guiding geovisualisation. Cartogr. J. 2008, 45, 227–238.
[58]
Reichenbacher, T. Die Bedeutung der Relevanz für die r？umliche Wissensgewinnung. In Geokommunikatiion im Umfeld der Geographie, Wiener Schriften zur Geographie und Kartographie; Kriz, K., Kainz, W., Riedl, A., Eds.; Institut für Geographie und Regionalforschung, Universit？t Wien: Vienna, Austria, 2009; Volume 19, pp. 85–90.
[59]
Open Geospatial Consortium. Available online: http://ogc.org (accessed on 5 December 2011).
[60]
Nivala, A.; Sarjakoski, T. An approach to intelligent maps: Context awareness. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on HCI in Mobile Guides, Udine, Italy, 8 September 2003.
[61]
Map-Based Mobile Services. Theories, Methods and Implementations; Meng, L., Zipf, A., Reichenbacher, T., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005.
[62]
Ke？ler, K.; Raubal, M.; Wosniok, C. Semantic rules for context-aware geographical information retrieval. Proceedings of 4th European Conference on Smart Sensing and Context, EuroSSC, Guilford, UK, 16–18 September 2009; 5741, pp. 77–92.
[63]
Mountain, D.; MacFarlane, A. Geographic information retrieval in a mobile environment: Evaluating the needs of mobile individuals. J. Inf. Sci. 2007, 33, 515–530.
[64]
Reichenbacher, T. The importance of being relevant. Proceedings of XXII International Cartographic Conference, Coruna, Spain, 11–16 July 2005.
[65]
Raper, J. Geographic Relevance. J. Doc. 2007, 63, 836–852.
MacEachren, A. Map complexity: Comparison and measurement. Am. Cartogr. 1982, 9, 31–46.
[68]
Lynch, K. The Image of the City; The MIT Press: Cambridge, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1960.
[69]
Golledge, R. Geographical Perspectives on Spatial Cognition. Behavior and Environment: Psychological and Geographical Approaches; Golledge, R., G？rling, T., Eds.; North-Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993; pp. 16–45.
[70]
Google maps. Available online: http://maps.google.com (accessed on 5 December 2011).
[71]
Craglia, M. Introduction to the international journal of spatial data infrastructures research. Int. J. Spat. Data Infrastruct. Res. 2006, 1, 1–13.
Wu, J.; Ping, L.; Ge, X.; Wang, Y.; Fu, J. Cloud storage as the infrastructure of cloud computing. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Cognitive Informatics, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 22–23 June, 2010; pp. 380–383.
[74]
Worldmapper. Available online: http://www.worldmapper.org (accessed on 5 December 2011).
[75]
Unique level of coverage in Switzerland. Available online: http://www.swisscom.ch (accessed on 5 December 2011).
[76]
International development research center. Available online: http://www.idrc.ca/cp/ev-6568-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html (accessed on 5 December 2011).
[77]
International Internet bandwidth > Mbps (per capita) (most recent) by country. Available online: http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/int_int_int_ban_mbp_percap-international-bandwidth-mbps-per-capita (accessed on 5 December 2011).
[78]
Norris, P. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2001.
[79]
Coltekin, A.; Heil, B.; Garlandini, S.; Fabrikant, S.I. Evaluating the effectiveness of interactive map interface designs: A case study integrating usability metrics with eye-movement analysis. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2009, 36, 5–17.
[80]
Stokes, M. Time in human–computer interaction: Performance as a function of delay type, delay duration, and task difficulty. PhD Dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA, May 1990.
[81]
Nielsen, J. Website response times. 2010. Available online: http://www.useit.com (accessed on 5 December 2011).
[82]
Chewning, E.C., Jr.; Harrell, A.M. The effect of information load on decision makers' cue utilization levels and decision quality in a financial distress decision task. Acc. Org. Soc. 1990, 15, 527–542.
