We report the results of a phase-shift analysis (PSA) of the low-energy π±p elastic-scattering data. Following the method which we had set forth in our previous PSA , we first investigate the self-consistency of the low-energy π±p elastic-scattering databases, via two separate analyses of (first) the π+p and (subsequently) the π-p elastic-scattering data. There are two main differences to our previous PSA: 1) we now perform only one test for the acceptance of each data set (based on its contribution to the overall 2) and 2) we adopt a more stringent acceptance criterion in the statistical tests. We show that it is possible to obtain self-consistent databases after removing a very small amount of the data (4.57% of the initial database). We subsequently fit the ETH model  to the truncatedπ±p elastic-scattering databases. The model-parameter values show reasonable stability when subjected to different criteria for the rejection of single data points and entire data sets. Our result for the pseudovector πNN coupling constant is 0.0726±0.0014. We extract the scattering lengths and volumes, as well as the s- and p-wave hadronic phase shifts up to T = 100 MeV. Large differences in the s-wave part of the interaction can be seen when comparing our hadronic phase shifts with the current SAID solution (WI08); there is general agreement in the p waves, save for the ~1/21- hadronic phase shift.
E. Matsinos, W. S. Woolcock, G. C. Oades, G. Rasche and A. Gashi, “Phase-Shift Analysis of Low-Energy Elastic-Scattering Data,” Nuclear Physics A, Vol. 778, No. 1-2, 2006, pp. 95-123.
A. Gashi, E. Matsinos, G. C. Oades, G. Rasche and W. S. Woolcock, Nuclear Physics A, Vol. 686, No. 1-4, 2001, pp. 447-462. doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00603-5; A. Gashi, E. Matsinos, G. C. Oades, G. Rasche and W. S. Woolcock, “Electromagnetic Corrections for the Analysis of Low Energy π ? p Scattering Data,” Nuclear Physics A, Vol. 686, No. 1-4, 2001, pp. 463-477.
R. A. Arndt and L. D. Roper, “The Use of Partial-Wave Representations in the Planning of Scattering Measurements. Application to 330 MeV np Scattering,” Nuclear Physics B, Vol. 50, No. 1, 1972, pp. 285-300.
U. Wiedner, et al., “Hidden Strangeness in the Proton? Determination of the Real Part of the Isospin-Even Forward-Scattering Amplitude of Pion-Nucleon Scattering at 54.3 MeV,” Physical Review D, Vol. 40, No. 11, 1989, pp. 3568-3581. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.40.3568
Ch. Joram, et al., “Low-Energy Differential cross Sections of Pion-Proton (π±p) Scattering. I. The Isospin-Even forward Scattering Amplitude at Tπ = 32.2 and 44.6 MeV,” Physical Review C, Vol. 51, 1995, pp. 2144-2158.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.51.2144; Ch. Joram, et al., “Low- Energy Differential cross Sections of Pion-Proton (π±p) Scattering. II. Phase Shifts at Tπ = 32.7, 45.1, and 68.6 MeV,” Physical Review C, Vol. 51, No. 4, 1995, pp. 2159-2165. doi:10.1103/Phys
B. J. Kriss, πN Newsletter, Vol. 12, 1997, pp. 20-25; B. J. Kriss, et al., “Pion-Proton Integral cross Sections at Tπ = 40 to 284 MeV,” Physical Review C, Vol. 59, No. 3, 1999, pp. 1480-1487. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.59.1480
A. A. Carter, J. R. Williams, D. V. Bugg, P. J. Bussey and D. R. Dance, “The Total cross Sections for Pion-Proton Scattering between 70 MeV and 290 MeV,” Nuclear Physics B, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1971, pp. 445-460.
E. Pedroni, et al., “A Study of Charge Independence and Symmetry fromπ+ andπ- Total cross Sections on Hydrogen and Deuterium near the 3,3 Resonance,” Nuclear Physics A, Vol. 300, No. 2, 1978, pp. 321-347.
J. C. Alder, et al., “Measurement of the Asymmetry Parameter A inπ-p Elastic and Charge-Exchange Scattering at Pion Energies Tπ = 98, 238, 292, and 310 MeV,” Physical Review D, Vol. 27, No. 5, 1983, pp. 1040-1055.
G. C. Oades, G. Rasche, W. S. Woolcock, E. Matsinos and A. Gashi, “Determination of the s-Wave Pion-Nucleon Threshold Scattering Parameters from the Results of Experiments on Pionic Hydrogen,” Nuclear Physics A, Vol. 794, No. 1-2, 2007, pp. 73-86.
R. A. Arndt, W. J. Briscoe, I. I. Strakovsky and R. L. Workman, “Extended Partial-Wave Analysis of πN Scattering Data,” Physical Review C, Vol. 74, No. 4, 2006, Article ID: 045205. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.74.045205
P. F. A. Goudsmit, H. J. Leisi, E. Matsinos, B. L. Birbrair and A. B. Gridnev, “The Extended Tree-Level Model for the Pion-Nucleon Interaction,” Nuclear Physics A, Vol. 575, No. 4, 1994, pp. 673-706.
R. Koch and E. Pietarinen, “Low-Energy πN Partial Wave Analysis,” Nuclear Physics A, Vol. 336, No. 3, 1980, pp. 331-346. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(80)90214-6; R. Koch, “A Calculation of Low-Energy πN Partial Waves Based on Fixed-t Analyticity,” Nuclear Physics A, Vol. 448, No. 4, 1986, pp. 707-731. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(86)90438-0
J. M. Alacrón, J. M. Camalich and J. A. Oller, “Chiral Representation of the πN Scattering Amplitude and the Pion-Nucleon Sigma Term,” Physical Review D, Vol. 85, No. 5, 2012, Article ID: 051503.