全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

PLOS ONE  2012 

The Shape of the Urine Stream — From Biophysics to Diagnostics

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047133

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

We develop a new computational model of capillary-waves in free-jet flows, and apply this to the problem of urological diagnosis in this first ever study of the biophysics behind the characteristic shape of the urine stream as it exits the urethral meatus. The computational fluid dynamics model is used to determine the shape of a liquid jet issuing from a non-axisymmetric orifice as it deforms under the action of surface tension. The computational results are verified with experimental modelling of the urine stream. We find that the shape of the stream can be used as an indicator of both the flow rate and orifice geometry. We performed volunteer trials which showed these fundamental correlations are also observed in vivo for male healthy volunteers and patients undergoing treatment for low flow rate. For healthy volunteers, self estimation of the flow shape provided an accurate estimation of peak flow rate (). However for the patients, the relationship between shape and flow rate suggested poor meatal opening during voiding. The results show that self measurement of the shape of the urine stream can be a useful diagnostic tool for medical practitioners since it provides a non-invasive method of measuring urine flow rate and urethral dilation.

References

[1]  Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao LM, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, et al. (2002) Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourology and Urodynamics 21: 261–274.
[2]  Madersbacher S, Alivizatos G, Nordling J, Sanz CR, Emberton M, et al. (2004) Eau 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (bph guidelines). European Urology 46: 547–554.
[3]  Nitti VW (2005) Pressure flow urodynamic studies: the gold standard for diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction. Rev Urol 7 Suppl 6: S14–21.
[4]  Pel JJM, van Mastrigt R (2002) Development of a low-cost flow meter to grade the maximum flow rate. Neurourology and Urodynamics 21: 48–54.
[5]  Addla SK, Marri RR, Daayana SL, Irwin P (2010) Avoid cruising on the uroflowmeter: Evaluation of cruising artifact on spinning disc flowmeters in an experimental setup. Neurourology and Urodynamics 29: 1301–1305.
[6]  Caffarel J, Robson W, Pickard R, Griffiths C, Drinnan M (2007) Flow measurements: Can several “wrongs” make a “right”? Neurourology and Urodynamics 26: 474–480.
[7]  Currie RJ (1998) The streamtest cup: a new uroflow device. Urology 52: 1118–21.
[8]  delaRosette JJMCH, Witjes WPJ, Debruyne FMJ, Kersten PL, Wijkstra H (1996) Improved reliability of uroflowmetry investigations: Results of a portable home-based uroflowmetry study. British Journal of Urology 78: 385–390.
[9]  Eggers J, Villermaux E (2008) Physics of liquid jets. Reports on Progress in Physics 71: 1–79.
[10]  Eggers J, Dupont TF (1994) Drop formation in a one-dimensional approximation of the navierstokes equation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 262: 205–221.
[11]  Lin SP, Reitz RD (1998) Drop and spray formation from a liquid jet. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 30: 85–105.
[12]  Papageorgiou DT (1995) On the breakup of viscous-liquid threads. Physics of Fluids 7: 1529–1544.
[13]  Rayleigh L (1878) On the instability of jets. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society s1–10: 3.
[14]  Dietz HP (2007) Does bladder neck descent increase with age? International Urogynecology Journal 18: 665–669.
[15]  Steenkamp JW, Heyns CF, deKock MLS (1997) Internal urethrotomy versus dilation as treatment for male urethral strictures: A prospective, randomized comparison. Journal of Urology 157: 98–101.
[16]  Greenwell TJ, Castle C, Andrich DE, MacDonald JT, Nicol DL, et al. (2004) Repeat urethrotomy and dilation for the treatment of urethral stricture are neither clinically effective nor cost-effective. Journal of Urology 172: 275–277.
[17]  Wiygul J, Babayan RK (2009) Watchful waiting in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Current Opinion in Urology 19: 3–6.
[18]  Neal DE (1997) Watchful waiting or drug therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia? Lancet 350: 305–306.
[19]  Jonas U, Hofner K (1996) Symptom scores, watchful waiting and prostate specific antigen levels in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Journal of Urology 156: 1040–1041.
[20]  Wasson JH, Reda DJ, Bruskewitz RC, Elinson J, Keller AM, et al. (1995) A comparison of transurethral surgery with watchful waiting for moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. New England Journal of Medicine 332: 75–79.
[21]  Reynard JM, Peters TJ, Lim C, Abrams P (1996) The value of multiple free-flow studies in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. British Journal of Urology 77: 813–818.
[22]  Caffarel J, Robson W, Pickard R, Newton D, Griffiths C, et al. (2006) Home uroflow device: Basic but more accurate than standard in-clinic uroflowmetry? Neurourology and Urodynamics 25: 632–633.
[23]  Boci R, Fall M, Walden M, Knutson T, Dahlstrand C (1999) Home uroflowmetry: improved accuracy in outflow assessment. Neurourol Urodyn 18: 25–32.
[24]  Golomb J, Lindner A, Siegel Y, Korczak D (1992) Variability and circadian changes in home uroflowmetry in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia compared to normal controls. Journal of Urology 147: 1044–1047.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus