In this paper we are
performing Spiking and Gap deconvolution on land 2D data; we are applying on the shot and stack
data with operator length (200
ms), while in the gap deconvolution it is used
different gap window (16.24 ms). The quality of output
data is better than input data, and there is homogeneity in the distribution of
frequencies. Also the band width of frequencies is increasing and smoothing specialist
in the case of spike deconvolution because it increases the temporal resolution
so, it appears for us
the inter beds between the layers and this is very important about the interpretation.
Cite this paper
Ali, H. Z. and Thabit, H. A. (2018). The Effect of Spike and Gap Deconvolution on 2D Land Seismic Data. Open Access Library Journal, 5, e4594. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104594.
De Monvel, J.B., Le Calvez, S. and Ulfendahl, M. (2001) Image Restoration for Confocal Microscopy: Improving the Limits of Deconvolution, with Application to the Visualization of the Mammalian Hearing Organ. Elsevier Aca-demic, Amsterdam.
Mhmod, M., Liu, H.Y., Lui, C. and Feng, X. (2016) Performing Spiking and Predictive Deconvolution on 2D Land Data (PSTM). Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 5, 239.