A recent publication revealed unexpected
observations about dark matter. In particular, the observed baryonic mass should
probably be sufficient to explain the observed rotation curves (i.e. without dark matter) and their
observations gave an empirical relation for weak accelerations. This present
work demonstrated that the equations of general relativity allow explaining the
term of dark matter (without new matter) in agreement with the results of this
publication and allow retrieving this empirical relation (observed values and
characteristics of this correlation’s curve). These observations constrain
drastically the possible gravitational potential in the frame of general
relativity to explain the term of dark matter. This theoretical solution has
already been studied with several unexpected predictions that have recently
been observed. For example, an article revealed that early galaxies (ten
billion years ago) didn’t have dark matter and a more recent paper showed
unlikely alignments of galaxies. To finish the main prediction of this solution, it is recalled:
the term of dark matter should be a Lense-Thirring effect, around the earth, of
around 0.3 and 0.6 milliarcsecond/year.
Cite this paper
Corre, S. L. (2017). Dark Matter without New Matter Is Compliant with General Relativity. Open Access Library Journal, 4, e3877. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103877.
Hobson, M.P., Efstathiou, G.P. and Lasenby, A.N. (2006) General Relativity: An Introduction for Physicists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790904
Clifford, M.W. (2014) The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment. Living Reviews in Relativity, 17, 4.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.12942/lrr-2014-4
https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2014-4
Le Corre, S. (2015a) Dark Matter, a New Proof of the Predictive Power of General Relativity. (Preprint) (arXiv:1503.07440).
https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07440
Adamek, J., Daverio, D., Durrer, R. and Kunz, M. (2016) General Relativity and Cosmic Structure Formation. Nature Physics, 12, 346-349.
https://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v12/n4/abs/nphys3673.html
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3673
Hildebrandt, et al. (2017) KiDS-450: Cosmological Parameter Constraints from Tomographic Weak Gravitational Lensing. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 465, 1454-1498.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2805
Genzel, R., et al. (2017) Strongly Baryon-Dominated Disk Galaxies at the Peak of Galaxy Formation Ten Billion Years Ago. Nature, 543, 397-401.
https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v543/n7645/full/nature21685.html
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21685
West, M.J., De Propris, R., Bremer, M.N. and Phillipps, S. (2017) Ten Billion Years of Brightest Cluster Galaxy Alignments. Nature Astronomy, 1, Article Number: 0157. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-017-0157
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0157
Tully, B.R., et al. (2015) Two Planes of Satellites in the Centaurus a Group. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 802, L25.
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2041-8205/802/2/L25
https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/802/2/L25
Taylor, A.R. and Jagannathan, P. (2016) Alignments of Radio Galaxies in Deep Radio Imaging of ELAIS N1. MNRAS, 459, L36-L40.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297897877_Alignments_
of_radio_galaxies_in_deep_radio_imaging_of_ELAIS_N1
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slw038
Hutsemekers, D. (1998) Evidence for Very Large-Scale Coherent Orientations of Quasar Polarization Vectors. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 332, 410-428.
https://orbi.ulg.ac.be/bitstream/2268/3811/1/1998A%2BA...332..410H.pdf
Hutsemekers, D., et al. (2005) Mapping Extreme-Scale Alignments of Quasar Polarization Vectors. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 441, 915-930.
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0507274
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20053337
Riess, A.G., et al. (2016) A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant. The Astrophysical Journal, 826, 56.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/56
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/56
